Thank you.
I agree, and letâs look at the motive behind the Military Gear Youtube channel.
Is it not quite clear what my motive is?
Why do you ask?
Quite an incredible question to askâŚ
Does pointing out about this channel what I did make me seem like one? Or because I used a Google product? Or is there anything else Iâve done to merit such a question?
I did not.
I took parts of what I have written to you and posted it here along with more.
Why?
My motivation to posting this is:-
-
Pointing out, explaining, that this particular channel seems deceptive. If I were someone who didnât know it then I would like for someone to show me.
-
âMilitary Gearâ doesn't properly provide sources to claims, especially if they are incredible claims. Sometimes when making other claims it might use various sources and even so called western sources. (If I was a person who didnât know this and just blindly went along when it says âExperts are saying or Russian Military has confirmedâŚâ I would like for someone to explain the problem with it)
-
Pointing out that it's not American like it sounds but an AI generated fake.
Did you, or anyone else here realize this, please? If I didnât know Iâd like for someone to tell ie to me. The same with the clickbatey AI generated thumbnails.
EDIT: addition: The channel has the same kind of fake, AI generated "bot" comments on the videos like Borzzikman has:- (If I was a person who didn't know these weren't real people I would appreciate that someone explained it to me)
Because I happened to look at this particular item and process it and tell you what I see. I wish to take things as they come, one thing, one detail at a time.
I did not happen to find an objective alternative source at this time.
I actually used a handful of AI tools to read through the subtitles of the channel and analyze it in various ways. I did not âlazily simply copy and paste from âGoogleâ but spent quite some time analyzing the channel from various angles.
The outputs Google Notebook LM, ChatGPT gave to my queries made sense and were cited from the subtitles and I did not see any deception.
If you detected any deception in my message please point it out.
Take this as humble guidance for future communication, if you will: If someone writes a message with many details pointed out, do not merely pick out the weakest part of the message and adress that whilist ignoring the rest, especially it that can be interpreted as a lazy Ad hominen / messenger attack.