The number of Spanish workers in Gibraltar has risen to 29% of the total following Brexit and the pandemic.
Spanish workers now make up 29% of the workforce in Gibraltar after their numbers increased by over a thousand in the last four years. Their presence is increasingly significant among the total foreign workforce on the Rock, which remains reliant on the labor force that crosses the border daily. Conversely, the number of foreign cross-border workers has decreased during the same period.
These are some of the conclusions drawn from the speech delivered by the Minister for Economic Development, Enterprise, Telecommunications, and Savings Bank of Gibraltar, Joe Bossano, during the parliamentary budget debate last Thursday.
According to Bossano, based on data from the open contracts register with the Employment Service, the number of cross-border workers did not increase in April compared to the previous month, with a total of 15,388 individuals. However, the number of Spanish workers within this total did increase by 7, from 10,344 to 10,351. "This is a continuation of the trend reflected in the nationality of cross-border labor since the 2019/20 fiscal year when the last general elections were held," explained the minister.
In March 2019, the cross-border workforce numbered 14,894 individuals, and by the end of 2023 (as of March), it had increased to 15,388, representing a rise of 484 over the four-year period. However, during that same time, the number of Spanish cross-border workers increased from 9,296 to 10,340, an increase of 1,048. "This means that the proportion of cross-border workers of Spanish nationality has increased at the expense of other nationalities, primarily from the European Union, with the largest decrease observed among British workers, whose numbers decreased from 2,378 to 1,984, a decline of 394," Bossano continued.
When comparing March 2023 with March 2020, when the coronavirus pandemic began, the figures show an increase of 181 employers (from 4,472 to 4,653) and 840 employees (from 34,876 to 35,716). "After 2019, the new economic model, in terms of our policy, can no longer be the increasing reliance on cross-border workers because the certainty of access (to the labor market) that existed when we were part of the European Union disappeared with Brexit and will not return," Bossano said.
From 2014 to 2018, the workforce experienced an increase of 5,573 individuals. The majority were cross-border workers, accounting for 82.3%. However, in the following four years (until October 2022), the increase was 1,155, and the trend slowed down, with residents now forming the majority (57.1%). "This is in line with our sustainability policy and the increase in per capita income. This is what we set out to do in the 2019 program: limit our dependence and increase our self-sufficiency to provide resilience to our economy," Bossano stated.
To understand the change, it is necessary to analyze the data from two periods. Between 2014 and 2018, there was an increase in the number of employers by 263 (from 1,624 to 1,887), and the workforce grew by 5,573 individuals (from 24,422 to 29,995). The participation of cross-border workers in the labor market increased from 9,070 to 13,654, an additional 4,584 positions. Therefore, out of the total increase, only 989 were resident workers. In other words, 82.3% of the increase were cross-border workers, and 17.7% were Gibraltarians.
However, from 2018 to 2022, there was an increase of 155 employers (from 1,887 to 2,042), and the workforce grew by 1,155 individuals (from 29,995 to 31,150). During the same period, the participation of cross-border workers in the labor market increased from 13,654 to 14,150, a rise of 496. Therefore, out of the increase of 1,155 individuals, 496 were cross-border workers, and 659 were residents. In other words, 42.9% of the new workers were cross-border, and 57.1% were residents.
"While it is likely that the employment service records may overstate the size of the workforce at any given time due to delays and, in some cases, employers failing to register layoffs, they are nevertheless a useful indicator of whether the workforce is growing or shrinking," the minister clarified.
Within the European Union, the only country with a similar percentage of cross-border workers is Luxembourg, whose per capita GDP is $127,580, the highest in the world. According to Luxembourg's National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (STATEC), 44.9% of its workforce consists of cross-border workers. The majority are individuals from France, followed by Germany and Belgium, who, as EU citizens, can travel freely without restrictions. This has been the case in Gibraltar as well, although it remains uncertain whether this may change based on the negotiation determining the Rock's access to Schengen.
Regarding Social Security contributions, Bossano stated that the government's policy is to introduce changes that would allow both men and women to receive a legal pension from the age of 60. However, this will only be possible if funding is secured through increased contributions, which will depend on the negotiation's outcome.
"Good afternoon, everyone. It's a day of great emotions for me, and I hope it's the same for all of us who have taken the oath today and are part of the Mancomunidad de Municipios del Campo de Gibraltar.
Civil authorities, military authorities, colleagues, friends, families, and house workers.
First and foremost, I want to thank all of you who have supported me in these past weeks. This new political journey is a significant personal and professional challenge, but I embrace it with great responsibility and enthusiasm. Without your support, it would be an uphill battle.
My other great thanks go to my family, and I extend this gratitude to the families of everyone here today. They are our foundation, our greatest support, and yet they are the ones who endure most of our ups and downs. I want to make a special reference to my father, who, thanks to technology, will be following us from the comfort of his home. From him, I learned three virtues he displayed throughout his life: tireless work, honesty, and unwavering loyalty. I hope his teachings have made me a better person and will accompany me in the next four years of work.
I worked in the media for many years and have spent twelve years in politics, responsible for a press office and a municipal television. I have faced countless times a blank sheet of paper or screen to write a press release, a report, an interview, or a speech. This time, what I had to write was for myself, and it has been more challenging than I imagined. I don't want to appear overly sensitive, but I want my first words leading this institution to reflect what I carry inside and my goals.
Those who know me know that I like to study, analyse, and understand. And what better study than what the people who preceded me in this position have attempted and often achieved. Since the creation of the Mancomunidad in 1985, we have had nine presidents. Almost 40 years of history that began with Rafael Palomino Kaiser, who will be remembered for his advocacy for the region's demands, always seeking consensus among those who have led the destinies of each municipality.
One of our responsibilities must be to reinforce the close ties we have with our neighbors in Gibraltar. Sociological, family, economic, cultural, sporting, or political bonds will be recognized in the work of this new team. If I had to choose a phrase, a purpose, a wish, from the situation created by Brexit, it is that it should be seen as an opportunity. An opportunity to grow as neighbours and equals, an opportunity to strengthen our existing ties, an opportunity to bridge differences and showcase the many good foundations that unite us.
The distorted and terribly unfair view that is often, more often than we would like, presented of our region is sometimes the result of exaggeration and sometimes of ignorance about what the Campo de Gibraltar truly is, its potential, its people, its rich and extensive heritage, its importance in the natural environment... and much of this ignorance is caused by ourselves, who instead of taking on the task of defending and promoting what is ours, are carried away by trends that tend to achieve the opposite.
When I was proposed to lead this institution, many people congratulated me while asking me what the Mancomunidad was for. It is a clear example of what I am trying to say, and I commit to continuing to fight, like my predecessors in the position, to ensure that the promotion of our region is always reflected in our work. Positive promotion and making known the important work carried out in this institution and the various organisations it comprises.
An example of this goal is the work that the Instituto de Estudios Campogibraltareños has been doing over the years: supporting, promoting, and safeguarding all the cultural, scientific, artistic, educational, and research potential in the Campo de Gibraltar.
Our region needs to continue working with a comprehensive plan to harness its potential, a plan that includes coherent and planned public investments, with fairness and balance compared to other territories, a plan that involves determined commitments from the Provincial Government, the Andalusian Government, the central Government, and the European Union. Regardless of who is in power, the important thing is that they look at the Campo de Gibraltar.
As the new president of the Mancomunidad de Municipios del Campo de Gibraltar, it is my duty to represent and work for the eight municipalities that make up our entity. To do this, I believe that the following objectives should be addressed:
Promote job creation and attract investments to foster economic growth and improve the quality of life for our citizens. Advocate for the improvement and modernisation of the region's road and transportation infrastructure, including better road connections and public transportation, not forgetting new energy sources. Boost tourism as an economic driver for the region, promoting sustainable tourism and environmental protection, utilising our unique natural and cultural resources. Drive improvements in the quality of education in our municipalities, as well as promote training and professional development to enhance job opportunities for our citizens. Implement environmental policies for the protection and conservation of our natural environment, as well as measures for adapting to and mitigating climate change. Promote the cultural development of our municipalities, preserving and highlighting our historical and cultural heritage, fostering citizen participation, and ensuring access to culture for all. And strengthen cooperation and coordination among the eight municipalities to promote joint projects and actions that benefit the entire region, optimising resources and sharing best practices. An example of these best practices is brought to us by the work of the Economic and Social Council, promoting our unity and the fight for what this region needs and deserves.
These are just a few examples of the needs and objectives that I, as the president of the Mancomunidad de Municipios del Campo de Gibraltar, believe we should address and work on together among the eight municipalities. It is essential to continue with a strategic plan that takes into account the specific characteristics of each municipality and seeks the common interest of our community. Together, we must achieve a better future, a prosperous and sustainable future for this beautiful region.
Jimena, with its rich history and privileged natural surroundings; Castellar, with its imposing castle, one of the most beautiful villages in Spain; San MartĂn del Tesorillo, known for its tranquillity and welcoming rural atmosphere; San Roque, the perfect combination of history, natural beauty, and quality of life; Los Barrios, with its significant industrial hub and a rich gastronomic scene in the heart of the Alcornocales Natural Park; Algeciras, strategically and economically important thanks to its port and geographical location; La LĂnea and its close relationship with Gibraltar, with its own tourist attractions, Andalusian cuisine, and major future projects; and Tarifa, the only place in Europe that combines a rich history, beautiful beaches, an exceptional natural environment, and diverse tourism offerings.
Our strategic location in the Strait of Gibraltar, embraced by two natural parks and the only intercontinental biosphere reserve, gives us significant importance that we must acknowledge, enjoy, and leverage. Understanding our realities and working to find solutions for them. This is the work carried out by Arcgisa, our service company, one of the first public companies of this kind in Andalusia.
In me, you will find (and I extend this to the entire team) someone open to dialogue, understanding, and respectful of different opinions. We are obligated to understand each other, even if it is more challenging in some cases, and we must work on the basis of respect, recognising our different realities with a common goal, to make our region better, and this is my primary commitment to the people of Campo de Gibraltar.
Together, we have outlined a bold and shared vision, a vision built on the strength of our diversity and the power of our unity.
As the president of the Mancomunidad, a position designed to provide cohesion and unity to the region, I pledge to you to work tirelessly to make our dreams and aspirations a reality. Our region has limitless potential, and with determination and effort, we can overcome any challenges that come our way.
I invite all of you to join in this journey towards a prosperous and sustainable future for the Campo de Gibraltar. I will listen to your voices, address your concerns, and consider your ideas because together, together, we are stronger.
History has shown us that when citizens come together around a common goal, the most extraordinary achievements become possible. So, let's look up and work together to build a region where equality, justice, and solidarity are the pillars of our society.
Let's make the Campo de Gibraltar known not only for its natural beauty and rich history but also for its brave, hardworking people committed to progress.
Thank you to each and every one of you for your trust and support. Let's move forward, united by a common purpose because together, we are the heart and soul of this land we love.
AS the Brexit treaty for Gibraltar falters over claims for joint use of its airport, a local enthusiast has pointed out that 58 military planes touched down there during 2023.
Regional Spanish newspaper Europa Sur pointed out that this continued presence of the RAF âhighlights the difficulty of the shared use of the airportâ.
Spainâs Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares already said in an interview with El Pais on December 10 that the âairport has to be in the agreementâ.
But some voices have indicated that it could be a problem because of its high UK military value
This point was highlighted by Europa Sur when it published the figures of the planes that have touched down there during 2023.
Local military enthusiast Michael J. Sanchez posted on X that 34 of the planes that used the airport were the A400 long range military transport aircraft.
There were also 10 C-17As, six C-130s, three Chinooks, three Envoy IV aircraft, one USAF C-40C and one PC6T landing at the local airfield.
It contrasts with 2022, when 117 military aircraft landed in Gibraltarâs airport with around 4,000 military passengers.
Gibraltar was a spybase throughout Cold War times according to website Declassified but still has several sites especially in the Upper Rock which are used by the MoD.
And foreign forces are sometimes stationed on the Rock, the UK government has revealed.
Armed Forces Minister James Heappey said âfour non-UK personnelâ were based on the Rock in April 2023.
Three of the C-130 Hercules planes that stopped on the Rock last year were from the Canadian Air Force, Sanchez also revealed.
And the UK has ruled out disclosing exactly how many sites it operates in Gibraltar and what they do.
But Spainâs ambassador to the UN Agustin Santos Maraver asked the UK for âthe withdrawal of military bases and installationsâ at a June 2023 UN meeting.
Despite this, Albares said that talks continue at âa very good rhythmâ after the 14th round of negotiations in London.
âThe proposal for a balanced, generous and good agreement to create the zone of shared prosperity is on the table,â Albares said in late December.
âWe continue to talk and negotiate with great intensity.â
The UK Armed Forces were not able to confirm these military aircraft figures to The Olive Press at the time of going to press.
The GBC News Editor is in Brussels to report on the treaty talks. Christine Vasquez said there is a push to get the deal done now, and it could be that Gibraltar is between a Rock and a hard Brexit.
The main players are present and expectations are high, even though the four politicians involved have been careful not to feed them.
The fact that negotiations on Gibraltar would be on the agenda in Brussels was a closely guarded secret - the announcement co-ordinated!
This is the second round in Brussels with this format and the time is right to announce a deal.
Spain provided the lead up with the Spanish Foreign Secretary briefing Campo representatives, and the Spanish Premier, Pedro Sanchez announcing he'll raise the issue in Parliament.
Next week the EU machinery halts temporarily ahead of European elections. Another catalyst for sorting things out now.
When the same four men met in Brussels last month- they announced tangible progress and real inroads with the Spanish Foreign Minister saying there were no longer meetings but continuous contact.
But goodwill and enthusiasm can only go so far. The deal needs to be at a stage where it's acceptable to all sides. It needs to be ready.
Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron and European Commissioner Maros Sefcovic were always going to meet in the Belgian Capital, chairing a meeting of the Trade and Co-operation Agreement Partnership Council.
Lord Cameron, who ironically was Prime Minister during the Brexit referendum is expected to welcome a close relationship with the EU, but there are many areas which test their friendship.
Weâre here in Brussels in the hope that Gibraltar is not one of them-and that us journalists will be able to tell you about a post Brexit success story, despite the fact that it was not Gibraltar which got us where we are today.
Cameron warns of âno dealâ impact on border, tells Brexiteer MPs Gib's UK sovereignty âwonât changeâ
A key aim of the negotiation for a UK/EU treaty on Gibraltar is to deliver a âfrictionlessâ post-Brexit border with Spain, Foreign Secretary David Cameron said on Monday, warning a âno dealâ outcome would lead to full Schengen checks that at present are not being applied by Spain.
Lord Cameron was answering questions from the European Scrutiny Committee in the House of Commons, whose members recently said aspects of the agreement under negotiation could result in âa significant diminution of British sovereigntyâ.
Lord Cameron rejected that suggestion as he was asked if he understood the meaning of the word sovereignty and whether he had read Gibraltarâs Constitution.
âI think I understand the meaning of sovereignty, which is Gibraltar is a sovereign UK territory and that shouldn't and won't change,â Lord Cameron said.
âAnd in our negotiations, there are three things that are absolutely paramount: One is the sovereignty of Gibraltar. The second is the operation of the defence facility. And the third is trying to achieve a deal that is good for the people of Gibraltar and, crucially, backed by the Government of Gibraltar.â
âSo those are our aims, but we don't want to see anything that diminishes in any way UK sovereignty over Gibraltar.â
Lord Cameron was quizzed on proposals to have a common travel area between Gibraltar and the Schengen, and for officers from Frontex, the EUâs immigration force, carry out Schengen checks on arrival at the airport or port.
Once in Gibraltar having cleared those checks, people would be able to cross freely into Spain without further immigration controls, effectively meaning the disappearance of the border.
But Brexiteer MPs on the committee voiced concern that British nationals arriving on British soil would have to undergo an EU immigration control and could potentially be refused entry, and that once inside Gibraltar, they would be subject to the Schengen limit of 90 days in 180 days.
Lord Cameron reminded MPs that under Gibraltarâs existing rules, non-resident British nationals had no automatic right of entry and could be refused, and that they were already limited to a maximum of 90 days for their visit.
The MPs put to Lord Cameron that the border was already fluid and that any delays were down to Spainâs âobstructionist policiesâ.
But the Foreign Secretary rejected the notion that the border was already fluid, noting the experience of Blue ID card holders, for example, or Britons heading to Spain already who faced tighter checks than most Gibraltar residents.
And he explained that without a treaty, things would get worse.
âI think right now, to be fair, they haven't fully introduced the Schengen checks that you would have on a Schengen border with a non-EU country,â Lord Cameron said.
âSo the difficulty is that if that were to happen - and it would happen, I suppose, in a non-deal scenario - you would have more questions and checks at the borderâŠyou have to check on other Schengen-y things.â
âAnd at that point, the situation could get worse, which is why the Gibraltarian government and people want to try and put this beyond doubt.â
âI think you have to bear that in mind that the status quo [at the border] is not forever.â
âI think the status quo would get worse in a full Schengen check scenario.â
MPs persisted in their questioning on the need to have Schengen checks on arrival at the airport.
Lord Cameron highlighted the importance of border fluidity to Gibraltarâs economy and said the Gibraltar Governmentâs overriding aim was to agree a framework that removes potential for delays.
âYou could say, no, Gibraltar should keep its pretty tough border with Spain and it should just take on the chin the fact that it's going to get tougher now that they are out of the EU and Spain is a Schengen country,â Lord Cameron told the committee.
âBut their view, having thought about it deeply, is that the border problems they've had in the past will actually probably get worse in that circumstance, and that's why they've opted for this model.â
âSo I think that's why it's important to understand what they're trying to achieve, and I'm trying to help them achieve that in this negotiation, but absolutely safeguarding the British Government's red lines, which remain, Gibraltar as a sovereign UK territory, the base operating as it does now, vital for our defence, and a deal that the Government of Gibraltar are 100% happy with.â
Lord Cameron likened the proposed arrangement to the presence French immigration officials in St Pancras to clear travellers heading to the EU.
âI don't think having that sort of arrangement in place, if it's to the benefit of your country, is a diminution of your sovereignty,â he said.
Asked about the lack of detail known publicly, Lord Cameron said treaties were often negotiated ââŠin a private space, because it's really hard work trying to get this stuff right.â
Many of the questions focused on Gibraltarâs role as a UK military base and the impact on defence issues of any treaty with the EU.
Lord Cameron sought to address concerns voiced by MPs that the treaty might somehow curtail the Ministry of Defenceâs ability to use Gibraltar as a logistics platform for operations elsewhere.
âWhat's absolutely crucial in these negotiations is that the defence function, as it were, must continue to be able to operate in exactly the same way it does now,â Lord Cameron said.
âWe must have the full control or operation of the airbase without let or hindrance.â
âI think that's incredibly important because ultimately, that is one of the things that Britain benefits from so much by having Gibraltar.â
The Foreign Secretary was clear that many of the issues raised by the committee were still under negotiation and, using a phrase often employed by his Spanish counterpart Jose Manuel Albares, said ânothing is agreed until everything is agreedâ.
He said the treaty included termination clauses â âit is a treaty you can leaveâ â and that while Gibraltar would have to pass into its own legislation some EU-equivalent laws, particularly about the operation of Schengen, it would not be subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.
âIt will be adjudicated by Gibraltarian judges, in Gibraltarian courts,â he said.
âThe ECJ won't have direct read-across to it or judicial oversight over it.â
The Foreign Secretary said the UK and Gibraltar were in âlockstepâ in the negotiation, describing Chief Minister Fabian Picardo as âan incredibly tough negotiatorâ who âis not going to give up one inch of sovereignty of the Rock of Gibraltar and Gibraltar itself, and neither am I.â
âThere are some very clear lines that we can't cross,â Lord Cameron said.
âAnd if a deal isn't possible, then we won't agree a deal.â
âBut we're hopeful. We think that there's been some good movement in the last few rounds of talks.â
âBut we're very clear. If a deal isn't right, we won't sign it.â
CM REACTS
After the session, Chief Minister Fabian Picardo said he was âimpressed but not surprisedâ by Lord Cameronâs grasp of the detail of the Gibraltar negotiation.
But he expressed disappointment at what he said was âthe failureâ by members of the European Scrutiny Committee to understand the constitutional relationship between Gibraltar and the UK and the issues that Brexit has created for Gibraltar.
âDavid Cameron has been clear in setting out that neither he nor I are going to give way on issues that relate to our sovereignty,â Mr Picardo said in a statement.
âMembers of the Scrutiny Committee seem, nonetheless, to want to believe everything they read in the newspapers over the evidence they are being given.â
âAdditionally they seem to want to turn a Nelsonian blind eye to the huge problems that their Brexit has created for Gibraltar and our current economic model.â
âMore worrying, there seemed to be a failure to understand some of the issues that arise and how to legally and logically resolve them.â
âProtecting the people of Gibraltar and fully preserving our sovereignty, jurisdiction and control is about more than just asking provocative questions, itâs about working to bring about deliverable outcomes.â
âI look forward to giving evidence to the Committee and addressing these issues to underline the answers given by Lord Cameron and our commitment to getting the negotiations right.â
âBut the ESC need to understand that they are not the decision makers in relation to Gibraltar.â
âThe Gibraltarians are, in consultation with the UK Government with which we are working hand in glove.â
Mr Picardo, who has already given evidence twice to the committee, has an invitation to address MPs after the parliamentary recess in the UK.
Given the track record with Brexit timelines since 2016, it should have come as no surprise that Rishi Sunak announced a general election for July 4. Itâs the latest pothole in the rocky road that has brought us to the current impasse.
For weeks weâve been told negotiators for a UK/EU treaty on Gibraltar are almost there, yet the finish line never seems to arrive. Despite positive messaging from all sides, thereâs quite a bit of distance between them. At least theyâre still at the table, signalling progress and âimportant breakthroughs,â so we continue to live in hope.
But the electoral calendars will have an impact. First EU elections in June, then a UK general election on July 4. Technical discussions on the Gibraltar treaty will continue in the meantime, but it seems unlikely that a political agreement can be settled until after the new UK Government is in place. Even then, the window of opportunity will be short given Brussels shuts down for August, and there will be changes in the top posts at the European Commission, including people involved in the Gibraltar talks.
Itâs possible we might still be waiting for this elusive treaty come Christmas or, dare I say it, beyond New Yearâs Eve. Given the Brexit rollercoaster since 2016, it was predictable that the negotiation would be hit by fresh hurdles on the final stretch. It would be funny if it wasnât so concerning, given whatâs at stake.
Spain in particular built up expectation in the run-up to the last high-level meeting in Brussels, with briefings to Campo mayors and bullish public statements by Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares.
When the anticipated announcement turned into yet another holding statement after seven hours of intense negotiation, that expectation morphed into frustration and hunger for progress and detail.
The electoral lull might defuse the pressure while technical teams try to close the gaps, but it wonât be easy because some positions appear irreconcilable.
But given the history, wasnât it always going to be thus?
Over the past fortnight, there have been statements from UK and Spanish MPs critical of some aspects of the negotiation. For the Brexiteers in London, British sovereignty was being diminished.
For the PP and Vox hawks in Madrid, Spain was about to sign up to a deal that would only benefit Gibraltar.
If the Brexiteers are angry in one camp, and the Spanish hawks are spitting poison in the other, it may yet be that negotiators are close to a deal which, warts and all, can be stomached with a spoonful of pragmatism by everyone else. If nothing else, it means those who would derail an agreement for ideological reasons have revealed their hands early.
It was tiresome to see how some UK MPs used the Rockâs symbolism as a rallying call for those dreaming of empire, without realising the Remainer natives are restless and have spent eight years trying to soften the landing after the Brexit vote in 2016. Most of us want more Europe, not less.
It was equally tiresome to hear right-wing Spanish MPs talk about Gibraltar in terms from another era when Spain was still a dictatorship.
In Brussels earlier this month, it was Commission Vice President Maros Sefcovic who offered the most significant observations on the treaty negotiation after his meeting with Lord Cameron, Mr. Albares, and Mr. Picardo failed to deliver a deal.
The discussions were âvery politicalâ but also âextremely technical,â Mr. Sefcovic said.
Marrying âpolitical willâ with âimplementable technical solutionsâ was not easy, he told reporters.
Perhaps the main takeaway from that Brussels meeting is that two Foreign Ministers and a Commission Vice President wouldnât spend seven hours locked in a room with Gibraltarâs Chief Minister if they didnât think a deal was possible.
Last week, as he gave evidence to Brexiteer MPs on the European Scrutiny Committee, Lord Cameron was asked why things couldnât just stay as they were at the border.
The observation displayed a deep ignorance of reality.
There was an argument, Lord Cameron accepted, that Gibraltar should just âtake on the chinâ the reality of a hard border.
But without a treaty, the current situation will only get worse, he said, damaging cross-border relations and Gibraltarâs economy, reliant as it is on workers who live in Spain. This point is often lost, not just in London.
What we have now at the border is not Brexit but a strange limbo where Spain turns a blind eye to Schengen obligations to maintain a constructive backdrop to ongoing dialogue.
Without a deal, British nationals â including Red ID cardholders â can expect long delays and close immigration checks, including providing reasons for travel, proof of hotel bookings, funds, and return travel arrangements.
This is not scaremongering but reality. Forget about nipping across to Mercadona, playing padel in Los Barrios, having lunch in Tarifa, or walking the dog in Pinar del Rey.
That is already the case for many non-EU nationals who are resident in Gibraltar but do not have Red ID cards. They are, in effect, trapped in Gibraltar unless they have proof of overnight arrangements in Schengen or onward travel.
Conservative MP David Jones was wrong to say the border was currently ârelatively fluidâ save for when Spain adopted âobstructionist policies.â
âRight now, they have not fully introduced the Schengen checks that you would have on a Schengen border with a non-EU country,â Lord Cameron told him.
Without a treaty, Spain would be obliged to introduce âSchengenyâ checks that would make things âworse.â
âThe status quo is not forever,â he said.
And that, in essence, is the dilemma we face.
In reaching a deal that marries political will and technical capabilities, there will have to be give and take on all sides.
And itâs not just the UK and Gibraltar that will have to weigh up whether the price of a deal is worth it.
In the Campo, where 15,000 people cross daily into Gibraltar for work, and where Gibraltarian custom is a mainstay for many businesses, a treaty is just as important for them as it is for us.
Negotiators have so far never lost sight of the fact that this treaty, above all, is about people.
To reach agreement, they will have to leapfrog over 300 years of history and discord, and that will take some mettle.
Gibraltar has so far been shielded from the worst of a hard Brexit by Spainâs willingness to be flexible at the border.
If Schengen rules were applied to their full extent, the harsh reality of Brexit would come into sharp focus.
That is the alternative we face in the absence of a deal.
And while some people might prefer to live on an island, I suspect most of us wouldnât.
Spainâs Minister for Foreign Affairs, Jose Manuel Albares, visited La Linea on Wednesday to hear at first hand the concerns of the Campo city most affected by Brexit given its close links to the Rock.
He also met with business and labour representatives in the Campo, who impressed on him the importance of border fluidity not just to Gibraltar, but to Campo businesses and cross-border workers.
âHe told us that the chances of this are zero.â
During his visit Mr Albares was driven along La Lineaâs seaboard from west to east, passing by the frontier precinct and development plots on the Spanish side of the border earmarked for construction of a commercial centre.
Mr Albares visited La Linea a day after meeting Campo mayors in Algeciras and attending a political rally in San Roque ahead of Sundayâs EU election in Spain.
Earlier in the week, he acknowledged La Lineaâs special circumstances after Brexit given its close proximity and relations with the Rock, describing it as âprobably the municipality in the European Union that has suffered the most from Brexit andâŠwhich will be most impacted by this [treaty] agreementâ.
Mr Albares met with Juan Franco, La Lineaâs mayor, and his team, discussing the city councilâs concerns around the treaty and the potential of a âno dealâ outcome.
Mr Franco said he had offered part of the border plot should it be required if a future treaty includes use of the airport and enables flights to other EU cities.
The mayor said he needs to work with Spanish government departments such as civil aviation to understand how any agreement on the airport, should it be finalised, might affect La LĂnea, including technical aspects such as height restrictions.
Mr Franco said the business centre planned for the site would be complementary to the existing ecosystem in Gibraltar and that gaming and insurance companies from the Rock had estimated that 3,000 jobs could be created.
âThey are the first ones interested in this,â the mayor said.
During his visit to La Linea, Mr Albares met with the mayor and a representation from the city council, meeting which Mr Franco said âimplies a differentiated treatment and shows Spain's willingness to deal directly with the impact of Brexit on La LĂneaâ.
They discussed issues including the environment, cross-border workers, companies and fishermen, among others.
Also on the agenda was La Lineaâs longstanding call for a differentiated tax regime that would enable it to be more competitive.
This is a call also echoed in other Campo municipalities but Mr Franco said that while he was not opposed to a Campo-wide regime, La Linea âneeds specific measuresâ to enable it to maximise any opportunities arising from a treaty.
âEqual taxation for the whole of the Campo could be worse for us than the closure of 1969,â he said, citing the limitations on land available for development in La Linea compared to other municipalities.
According to Mr Franco, Mr Albares was sensitive to this very complex issue, which will be dealt with in direct dialogue between the ministry and the city council.
Mr Franco said too that âimaginative situations are being put forwardâ on the issues of cross-border workers and pensions, after Mr Albares acknowledged that, while there was inequality compared to Gibraltar residents, there was discriminatory regime in place.
Mr Franco would not be drawn on any detail of the discussion, however, given it is still the subject of negotiation.
The mayor also reflected on the impact that a deal on free movement across the border could have on the delivery of municipal services if there is a greater influx of people crossing into the Spanish border town.
At the moment, La Linea city council is subject to strict budgetary constraints and Mr Franco asked the minister for a ârelaxationâ of these measures to be able to cope, if necessary, with more capacity in public services for a greater volume of people in the city.
Mr Albares' visit will continue with another visit by the State Secretary for Foreign Affairs to learn more about the situation in situ âand to continue to propose solutions to the problems," according to Mr Franco.
The mayor also demanded a âplan Bâ in the event that there is no agreement.
âWe are at a key moment, at a turning point, in which either the definitive leap is made, or we face a virtual [border] closure, even if itâs not physical,â he said.
BUSINESS AND WORKERS
Ahead of his meeting with Mr Franco, Mr Albares met with representatives from the Campo business community and unions.
The meeting had been billed on Tuesday as a discussion with the Cross Frontier group, but in the event only the Spanish members were invited, and in their own capacity as individual organisations.
But he noted in this context the need for an agreement on taxes on goods that âwill hopefully be good for us and fundamental for the whole areaâ.
La LĂnea's former mayor, Juan Carmona, said âthe minister has listened to us and shares our point of viewâ.
âThe [treaty] would mean the removal of the border fence, but the EU Customs Union also has its rules,â he said.
âThey can be adjusted, modulated to establish certain periods of application in fiscal matters and others, but these are the rules and all of us have to comply with them.â
âAnd it is not up to Spain or its minister to change them.â
The Comisiones Obreras' union (CCOO) secretary, Manuel Triano, and the UGT union secretary, Ăngel Serrano, also reacted positively to the meeting.
âWe are still committed to an agreement, because a non-agreement would be a drama for this region and a catastrophe for Gibraltar, and we understand that the interests of the citizens must come before those of sovereignty and others,â he said.
Nevertheless, the CCOO secretary added that the much vaunted goal of shared prosperity âis not the panacea that will solve all the problemsâ.
Mr Triano told the minister that the Andalusian and Spanish governments also need to fulfil parallel commitments made to the Campo de Gibraltar outside of the treaty negotiation.
The regional secretary of UGT, Ăngel Serrano, asked for speed in closing the deal.
In addition, as a spokesperson for the Cross-Border Group, Mr Serrano handed over to the minister documentation about the group.
âI have provided him with information from the Cross-Border Group, because he had very vague information, so that he is aware of it to call us and also to listen to the Gibraltar side,â Mr Serrano said.
Earlier in the morning, Mr Albares also had a meeting with the Ascteg Cross-Border Workers Association.
He summoned them to another meeting in Madrid to discuss matters of concern to them.
La LĂnea's mayor, Juan Franco, held a "dense and complex" meeting with Spainâs State Secretary for the European Union, Fernando Sampedro, and his team on Tuesday evening, analysing in depth the repercussions of Brexit on the Spanish city.
After the meeting, Mr Franco confirmed that the Spanish Givernment "is aware of all the issues that concern us in our city regarding Brexitâ.
He said these include the impact on cross-border workers, pensions, businesses and the potential implications of removing the border and enhanced use of Gibraltarâs airport.
The mayor welcomed the focus on La Linea and the effort to address its concerns, adding: "We are now recognised [by Madrid] as the city mainly affected by Brexit in relation to Gibraltar."
"All the problems that concern us so much are on the agenda, they are being dealt with and solutions are being sought,â he said.
Mr Franco expressed his hope that agreement on a UK/EU treaty for Gibraltar would be reached soon and that "a viable future for our town will be guaranteed".
Mr Sampedro and his team from Spainâs Ministry for Foreign Affairs also met with the cross-border workersâ association Ascteg.
The Chief Minister says that eight years on from the Brexit referendum, we are in a much better place than anyone could have predicted.
Fabian Picardo says the fact negotiations continue and that no-one has got up from the table, is a "demonstrable success" and shows the will to find a solution and to close a treaty.
The Chief Minister hosted the Mayor of La Linea, Juan Franco.
The purpose of the meeting was to cross-brief on the ongoing negotiations.
Juan Franco says that in recent months, he has sat in up to eight meetings with different layers of the political set-up, ranging from the regional Mancomunidad de Municipios to high level briefings from the Spanish Foreign Minister and the EU's Secretary of State.
The Mayor of La Linea says he is satisfied with the level of communication and involvement - but he points out that there are issues which could need addressing - remarking on the possible changes at the frontier. Juan Franco says that issue in particular would require the involvement of La Linea in technical talks.
Juan Franco, the mayor of La Linea, is optimistic about the prospects of agreement on a UK/EU treaty for Gibraltarâs post-Brexit relations with the bloc.
Despite that optimism, Brexit remains at the top of the list of the challenges facing La Linea, the issue that worries him most due to its wide-ranging implications.
In an interview with the Chronicle, Mr Franco said socioeconomic relations between La Linea and Gibraltar were in the balance, including the livelihoods of over 10,000 cross-border Spanish workers who play a vital role in the Rockâs economy.
âGibraltar would have a big problem, but we would have a catastrophe,â he said.
And yet, despite the uncertainty of Brexit, La Linea has been transformed in recent years under the stewardship of Mr Franco and his La Linea 100x100 party.
With an eye on the progress of the Brexit talks, Mr Franco continues to push too for the modernisation of a city that has now developed a new General Urban Development Plan, a critical tool to attract investment.
Q.- La LĂnea has been changing over the last few years. What is the most important achievement in the past year?
A.- Youâll be surprised, but I think weâve reached a turning point in the way we are perceived.
Q.- The public perception of the town?
A.- Yes, in fact, we have just received an award from the newspaper 'La RazĂłn' at the headquarters of the Comunidad de Madrid for the best series of concerts in Spain 'En La LĂnea MĂșsica', which boosted the town and also its economic activity. They can see weâre changing and everybody who comes here is perplexed, because they expect something different. For example, the Spanish U20 basketball team, who walked to the pavilion to play and saw that we are not that city with the strange image generated by the media as a result of some very unpleasant moments, which I have never hidden. I think we are changing the city and everything we organise becomes a party: Ruta de la Tapa, Ruta del AtĂșn, concerts in the Palacio de Congresos, concerts in the bullring, concerts in Jardines Saccone, exhibitions. I think we are totally turning the dynamic around.
Q.- And physical projects?
A.- For example, the Avenida de España. Although the pavement also needs to be changed, because it has not been compacted and the work is still under guarantee. It has to be dug up in its entirety.
Q.- Another controversial issue has been the marketâs refurbishment. The renovation is almost finished, but there is still disagreement between the traders and the Town Hall.
A.- If the traders were to go to the market paying what they pay now, they would just cover 5% of the cost of the service. The city cannot afford it. Reasonable rates are going to be applied, 400 euros for a stall covering eight square metres.
Those who do not agree have been offered a stall at the Junquillo market. It is cheaper, although it has other conditions. But the city council is under state intervention and can no longer subsidise private activity. The new market will have all the services.
Q.- When will it open?
A.- Our objective is to finish the work in October, although we will have to see how the matter with the traders evolves. If there is no agreement, we will have to put out a tender for the stalls. We will try to ensure that there is regular activity, although the idea is not to turn it into a gourmet market, but to maintain what exists: that current stallholders return to the new one. But they have to accept the costs.
Q.- In any event, La LĂnea is not a cheap town to live in.
A.- It is very clear to me. La LĂnea is an expensive town. Housing is expensive because of the lack of space and the high cost of housing in Gibraltar. Salaries there are above the average here, they can pay higher rents and, according to the newspaper ExpansiĂłn, for example, we are the eighth city in Spain and the first in Andalusia in terms of return on investment in housing. The return on rent is 8% at the moment. Furthermore, our municipal area is very limited and the basic planning framework dates back to 1985. In fact, I believe that with the new General Urban Development Plan [PGOU, by its Spanish acronym] there is not going to be a collapse in the price of housing, but a significant number of homes will be put on the market and we will be able to address this need a little. With the forecasts of the previous plan alone, some 3,000 dwellings, we would be able to satisfy this need.
Q.- The new PGOU is a key project for the future.
A.- Someone once told me that the mayor who delivers the market, resolves the city councilâs employment issues and the approves the new PGOU will go down in the history books. The first has already come out, the second we have 17 rulings in favour, none against and it is no longer a controversy, and we are negotiating modifications to the employment list every year. We have a public employment offer every year, we are immersed in a stabilisation process, calls for applications are issued in due time and form, we have created pools of employment for interim staff. We have made a leap in staff overnight. And all of this with an austerity plan that prevents us from hiring more staff.
Q.- And the PGOU?
A.- The Junta's delegation for Territorial Planning already informed us in writing that the file is completed. Now they are asking us for clarification on certain points, but they are not significant matters. From that point on, nobody should think that I have a magic wand, but we will give the go-ahead to make changes. I think that from October onwards, that change will start to be seen. We are going to need more staff, let's see how it can be achieved.
Q.- At that point, the process of tendering and remodelling spaces will start.
A.- That's right. It is an objective reality that the city is evolving. There are also those who generate artificial controversies with political interests, such as why the athletics track has been removed from the football stadium or whether the Avenida de España has gone from two lanes to one to make it a pedestrian zone. We have been criticised for implementing the 'ten-minute' city or Agenda 2030. Nevertheless, I believe that we are shaping the city we want.
Q.- Not everyone has to support everything and criticism has to be accepted.
A.- That's exactly what I say.
Q.- What are the biggest challenges or problems in the city now?
A.- The biggest challenge is Brexit. Of every three people at working age in La LĂnea, one works in the city or the bay; another works in Gibraltar, and the third is unemployed. If there were no agreement and if the border was tightened, if five seconds were spent inspecting passports and 10,000 people entered Gibraltar every day, the first one would enter in five seconds, but the last one would take 14 hours. Like going to New Delhi to work by plane every day. It makes absolutely no sense at all. But it's such a big problem that it's not up to me and I can't do more than I'm trying to do. I met with the Minister, Secretary of State, Head of Cabinet, Ombudsmen in Brussels, the Government of Gibraltar, President of the DiputaciĂłn, Presidents of the Junta de AndalucĂa... But I feel like GarcĂa MĂĄrquez's Colonel.
Q.- He has no one to write to him.
A.- Indeed.
Q.- Eight years on, what is your opinion about Brexit?
A.- I am still very concerned, the situation is completely undesirable. I have a very good relationship with the Chief Minister of Gibraltar. And right now I think we are at an interesting point because there is a team in the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in Madrid who are very involved and have detailed knowledge on the subject. They don't look at me with puzzled expressions when I explain our border status.
Q.- They are familiar with the area.
A.- At least, when I talk to them about pensions, they explain to me that it is not a question of discrimination, but of inequality. For example.
Q.- Is an agreement on Brexit going to solve the problem with pensions, the development of the land [in La Linea] adjacent to the Rock and the rest of the issues linked to Gibraltar?
A.- The agreement should cover many aspects, I suppose. I imagine that it would comprise a general framework and then it would have to be broken down, section by section. The matter is complex. But I can say that I do see a willingness to reach the points of understanding that we all want to see reached. Let's hope it all works out.
Q.- And what if there is no agreement?
A.- Application of community regulations [at the border].
Q.- La LĂneaâs problems would multiply exponentially. Is there any plan B?
A.- That is the part that worries me the most and I have conveyed it to the minister and to everyone who has walked through the door. If negotiations continue tomorrow, but the community regulations are applied, how do we solve this mess?
Q.- And what is the answer?
A.- They tell me not to worry. And every time someone says that to me, I get more worried. I know that Gibraltar already has contingency plans. I hope we don't end up in a situation similar to 1969. Gibraltar would have a big problem, but we would have a catastrophe. Because we would go from more than 9,000 unemployed to 20,000.
Q.- What would you highlight from your last meeting with Picardo?
A.- Firstly, I think we have a friendly relationship. I have a good relationship with him, I think he has the same with me and, if we have not been able to make more progress on other issues, it is because every time we see each other it is to talk about Brexit. He is a person with sensitivity, well-prepared and who, as Chief Minister of Gibraltar, is defending the rights of his people. That's normal. I always give my opinion on this issue in a private way, because I am simply the mayor of a Spanish city. My feeling at the last meeting was that, if there is goodwill on all sides, I think an agreement could be reached. And there are many issues to deal with, such as pensions, border controls... But I think there can be points of understanding and I hope that we will be taken into account, because there are issues where La LĂnea has things to say. I hope that solutions will be sought.
Q.- There are developments planned with investors from Gibraltar. With an agreement, they would be naturally implemented. And if not?
A.- Right now there are three Gibraltarian companies with very strong investments in La LĂnea. If there is no agreement, those investments will continue. The marina would have enormous development opportunities. And if there is no agreement, it will continue to be there and with a good business.
Q.- What is the message to investors?
A.- Letâs separate the issues. In Brexit, for me the main concern is the workers and the turnover generated by our companies through business related to Gibraltar. Separately, regarding Gibraltar's investments in La LĂnea, we have the marina; 250 homes in Alcaidesa; projects in Santa Margarita.... If there were no agreement, the problem is that there are so many workers and such a high level of unemployment in the city that a very complex situation would arise.
Q.- But, for example, the business centre on the fairgrounds, would it go ahead?
A.- The business centre will go ahead even if there is no agreement. But it would also complicate certain incentives that the agreement would bring, let's not kid ourselves. It is not the same to have border fluidity and an international airport next door as it is to have restrictions at the border crossing.
Q.- Despite everything, at least you don't say that the main problem in La LĂnea is drug trafficking now.
A.- That's another one, but it's happening like in the mid-nineties. Back then there was a surge in tobacco smuggling and the state reacted by deploying a strong response. That was buried, but the root of the problem was not tackled. Now, 30 years later, it is a repeat of that but with narcotics. Morocco is still where it was. And, although what I am about to say is very harsh and I don't want it to be misunderstood, I believe that the public perception is that, if it is not made public, there is no problem. Like someone who has undetected cancer. The reality is that right now it's not news. The problem arose when they became more and more daring, such as the assault on the hospital, the smuggling operation on Good Friday in El Carmen, and at that moment we were placed under the spotlight. And a stereotypical image was generated, even caricatured at times, so that many people almost thought that this was the MedellĂn of Pablo Escobar. MedellĂn which, incidentally, has also been regenerated hugely. We know this because we have been in contact with them. But here it has never reached those levels, nor have there been any deaths in recent years.
Q.- There have been some significant attacks on law enforcement officers.
A.- Some. But in Marbella 18 people were shot dead in one year not so long ago. Why does La LĂnea have the stigma and not Marbella? In some political sphere, it appears to matter that should be a sewer somewhere. After a shooting in 2018 in which a father was killed leaving his son's communion, the regional councillor for tourism had to call me to apologise for saying that it was a one-off case and not what happens in La LĂnea de la ConcepciĂłn. Obviously. Because here, there are no clear-cut dead people in the streets. The headline stayed, he apologised to me, but it didn't run in any of the media.
Q.- The problem is that the stigma goes back a long way.
A.- Historical. For example, the mayor of Barbate never tired of repeating that the attackers of the two Guardia Civil officers in February were from La LĂnea. And all the people who were in the port cheering on them, where did they come from? Chartered buses from here, or were they people from Barbate? This is everyone's problem, but I am faced with a lack of solidarity from some municipalities. The formula to fix the problem is to recognise that you have it. And that is what I have done. We are working to improve the issue and we still have a long way to go, regrettably.
Q.- La LĂnea has been asking the Spanish Government for a long time for special and unique tax conditions, different to the rest of the Campo. When [Foreign Minister] Jose Manuel Albares came, he spoke of this possibility. How is it going?
A.- Waiting. And I hope it will materialise one day, because it is the future of the city. Let's be optimistic.
Q.- Do you have political aspirations beyond the city?
A.- No, none.
Q.- And in that national platform of independent parties?
A.- Juan Franco has already gone as far as he is going to go. My highest political aspiration is to be mayor of the most important municipality in the world, La LĂnea de la ConcepciĂłn. But we will have to look after our own interests.
Q.- Does that mean that you see yourself as a member of Congress?
A.- No, I am not going to be a Member of Congress, nor an Member of the Andalusian Parliament, nor am I going to return to the DiputaciĂłn Provincial de CĂĄdiz, unless critical circumstances force me to do so. It is neither in my plans nor in those of my party. Now, letâs what happens in the next election.
Q.- You are the most voted mayor in Spain and without a strong opposition. If this stays like this, how long do you plan to continue?
A.- As long as the people of my town want me to, as long as I have the strength, I will continue. One of my kids is in university, the other is becoming more independent, and my family is well. My current partner is a councillor in the city council and I am at peace in this sense, because many people don't understand this work. I don't want to say that it cost me my marriage, but it affected me a lot. I think I still have a lot of energy left in me.
Just so you are aware of this news concerning Spain-Vox's so-called claims to Gibraltar:-"VOX: âit is pertinent that the Government of Spain demands that the British government begin the negotiation process on the recovery of Spanish sovereignty over the Rock of Gibraltar.â
Spanish VOX demands that the Government recover sovereignty over the Rock, the last colony on European soil
The VOX Parliamentary Group has presented a non-legislative proposal regarding the recovery of Spanish sovereignty over the Rock of Gibraltar, for discussion in the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
In this initiative, VOX recalls that after the United Kingdom leaves the European Union, no agreement between the EU and London can be applied to the territory of Gibraltar without an agreement between Spain and the United Kingdom, as recognized by the Spanish Government itself. This is corroborated by clause number 24 of the Guidelines of the European Council for the negotiation of Brexit. This protocol includes for the first time in the basic law of the European Union provisions relating to Gibraltar negotiated by Spain.
On the other hand, article 50 of the Declaration of the European Council and the European Commission highlights that âonce the United Kingdom has left the Union, Gibraltar will not be included in the territorial scope of the agreements concluded between the Union and the United Kingdom. This does not exclude, however, the possibility of separate agreements being concluded between the Union and the United Kingdom regarding Gibraltar. Without prejudice to the powers of the Union and in full respect of the territorial integrity of its Member States guaranteed by Article 4, paragraph 2, of the Treaty on European Union, such separate agreements will require the prior agreement of the Kingdom of Spain.
It is also worth highlighting the Brussels Declaration of 27 November 1984, in which Spain and the United Kingdom agreed to establish a negotiating process âin order to resolve all their differences over Gibraltarâ within the framework of which âsovereignty issues will be dealt withâ.
An even more important fact is that Gibraltar has been on the United Nations list since the 1960s as one of the ânon-autonomous territories pending decolonisationâ. In this regard, Spain has repeatedly asked the United Kingdom to enter into negotiations, in compliance with the provisions of the United Nations, to reach a definitive solution to the dispute over Gibraltar, the only existing colony in Europe.
Thus, the United Nations has pointed out on several occasions that, âin the process of decolonisation of Gibraltar, the applicable principle is not that of the free determination of peoples but that of the restoration of Spanish territorial integrityâ. Resolution 1514 (XV), Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, states in point 6 that âany attempt aimed at undermining, in whole or in part, the national unity and territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nationsâ. Therefore, the return of Gibraltar to Spanish sovereignty must be one of the âhighest prioritiesâ for the Government of Spain.
The conflict between Spain and the United Kingdom over the sovereignty of the Rock has its origin in the Treaty of Utrecht, signed by both nations in 1713, as a solution to the War of Succession. By signing this treaty, Spain ceded to Great Britain âthe city and castle of Gibraltar together with its port, defences and fortresses belonging to itâ.
However, the isthmus (like the adjacent waters or the airspace above it) was not ceded by Spain, always remaining under Spanish sovereignty. Furthermore, Article X of the aforementioned treaty includes three conditions under which the cession is framed, which are the following:
The ceded territory is defined as the city and castle of Gibraltar, together with its port, defences and fortresses belonging to it, without a time limit, but without any territorial jurisdiction.
Open communication with the surrounding country by land is not permitted, except for supplies in case of need. 3) Spain has a right to redeem the city of Gibraltar, that is, to recover its sovereignty, in case Great Britain wants to give, sell or otherwise alienate its property.
In view of the above, VOX denounces that âthe mere continued de facto occupation by the British of the isthmus and the adjacent waters contravenes the conditions agreed in the Treaty of Utrecht for the acquisition of sovereignty over that territory, -since the transfer of sovereignty is limited only to the city and castle of Gibraltar, together with its port, defences and fortresses-, in addition to being illegitimate under International Law.â
As if this were not enough, VOX warns that âthe United Kingdomâs intention to give a new legal status to Gibraltar outside the decolonizing framework constitutes an action of those provided for in the Treaty of Utrecht that would enable Spain to redeem the city of Gibraltar.â Thus, the insistence on the unilateral promise of the United Kingdom to comply with the will of the Gibraltarians to acquire their own autonomy would tacitly imply the âalienationâ of British property. Although this alienation would not be carried out with respect to another power or State, but with respect to the population of Gibraltar itself - VOX maintains - âthe return to Spain does not depend according to International Law on this local will but on the decision of Great Britain to change the property regime in any way.â
In this sense, it is worth mentioning that the British colony has become the headquarters of a multitude of Spanish companies and corporations thanks to the unfair tax competition that the Gibraltarian authorities promote. Proof of this is that the Spanish Government includes the colony in its list of countries and territories considered to have âharmful tax regimes.â
In turn, over the last few years, the municipal authorities of the colony have considerably aggravated the breaches of what was agreed in Utrecht, since they have launched an expansionist policy of constant growth of the territory of the Rock, as well as constant harassment of the Spanish State Security Forces and Corps.
Taking into account this growing lack of cooperation with our country and the persecution of political representatives of national sovereignty and the Spanish people, the issue of the return of Gibraltar by the United Kingdom to its legitimate owner, which is Spain, is of greater urgency.
In this non-legislative proposal, VOX concludes that the Government of Pedro SĂĄnchez âmust abandon the theses of shared prosperityâ, which, to date, have only produced the dependence of a large part of the Campo de Gibraltar region on the British colony. Thus, it is also urgent to create a comprehensive plan for this Cadiz region, which includes a package of economic measures to alleviate the delicate situation suffered by its inhabitants.
For all the above, VOX understands that âit is pertinent that the Government of Spain demands that the British government begin the negotiation process on the recovery of Spanish sovereignty over the Rock of Gibraltar.â
It belonged to the Brits long before the Treaty of Utrecht. It will always be British. Find out more about its ancient past - Gibraltar British or Spanish?
A YouGov Poll has revealed the majority of people in Britain believe the UK was wrong to leave the European Union, and would vote to rejoin if there was a referendum.
However, the majority of respondents agree the Labour Government does not have a mandate to call a referendum.
In an interview La Razon, the fierce advocate for Spanish sovereignty over Gibraltar warned the current Madrid government, led by Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, against giving up on "co-sovereignty" of The Rock. More...
The Spanish Foreign Minister has told journalists in Spain that a UK/ EU agreement over Gibraltar is almost finalised with only a few technical details remaining.
Jose Manuel Albares said he hoped the deal could be finalised as soon as possible.
News of the Treaty from a negotiator comes after a period of summer silence.
With summer coming to a close, the political drums are beating again.
Spanish press reports claim the Spanish Government and its European colleagues hope to have an agreement over Gibraltar in place before November to avoid having to impose restrictions at the frontier with the introduction of the Schengen Entry/Exit scheme on the 10th.
With bridging measures currently in place between Gibraltar and Spain, Treaty negotiators will be hoping for a smooth transition.
In fact, no infrastructure for the upcoming scheme, appears to have been installed, despite there being under three months to go.
Jose Manuel Albares said Spain and the Uk are working towards accelerating a treaty deal over Gibraltar.
Negotiations, he said, are in their final stage, but he added there are still issues to resolve on the free movement of people and goods.
With everyone having heard this all before- there will be scepticism.
No new details on a future treaty have emerged with the Junta de Andalucia condemning the lack of information and calling for transparency.
Spain open to âconstructive solutionsâ on Schengen controls as Gib treaty talks enter âirreversibleâ stage
Spain is open to âconstructive solutionsâ to allow freedom of movement at its border with Gibraltar while meeting its Schengen obligations, Spanish Minister for Foreign Affairs, Jose Manuel Albares, said in an interview with El Pais published on Monday.
Mr Albares said Spainâs objective remained to reach an agreement âto create a zone of shared prosperityâ between Gibraltar and the Campo but added the requirements of the Schengen zone must be met.
âThe Schengen code establishes how things must be done,â he told El Pais.
âIf Gibraltar wants freedom of movement, it can have it; the only thing is that it must follow the procedures that apply at all entry and exit points of the Schengen area.â
Mr Albares is due to meet soon with his UK counterpart David Lammy, with whom he has already discussed the Gibraltar negotiation after Labourâs general election win.
Negotiators have avoided setting a deadline for the talks, which commenced in 2021 but remain stuck on issues including how Schengen immigration controls will be run inside Gibraltar in the event of agreement.
Forthcoming changes to automate Schengen controls as from November have focused minds amid concerns of delays and restrictions at the border unless a deal is agreed first. Gibraltar has vowed to reciprocate any new controls implemented on the Spanish side.
âThe negotiation is at an irreversible point where we either finalise the agreement, or the British side indicates that they don't want it,â Mr Albares said in the interview.
âBut I insist: what I've seen in Lammy is that there is a will to reach it.â
âIt's true that the new entry and exit control system for the Schengen area comes into effect on November 10, and that includes Gibraltar.â
âAll the more reason to have this agreement as soon as possible.â
One of the main areas of disagreement centres on Spainâs demand that armed uniformed Spanish police officers be present for immigration controls inside Gibraltar and free to move between the airport and the port.
Both the UK and Gibraltar have rejected that proposition, pointing instead to the New Yearâs Eve framework agreement of 2020 which envisaged a joint facility spanning both sides of the border, alongside the assistance of Frontex officers at least during the first four years of any agreement.
Spain would be the Schengen state responsible for ensuring the integrity of the controls from the shared facility, but Frontex would carry out the practical work inside Gibraltar.
Asked during the interview whether Spain would accept Spanish officers on duty in Gibraltar without uniforms or weapons âas Picardo is asking forâ, Mr Albares said the Schengen code âestablishes how things must be doneâ.
âIf Gibraltar wants freedom of movement, it can have it; the only thing is that it must follow the procedures that apply at all entry and exit points of the Schengen area,â Mr Albares said.
âLetâs see what Lammy proposes and how."
"Spain is always willing to apply constructive solutions that ensure security at the controls and the free movement of people and goods.â
Asked if that included allowing Spanish police officers to freely move through Gibraltar, Mr Albares replied: âIt involves applying the Schengen code. There is nothing unusual about demanding that.â
Last week after his meeting with Mr Lammy, the Chief Minister said that any agreement on a UK/EU treaty for Gibraltar must âensure that the red lines of none of the [negotiating] parties are in any way transgressedâ.
âThat means our fundamental core red lines and all of the issues that every Gibraltarian knows off by heart on sovereignty, and all of the issues that are relevant to us, both politically, legally and economically,â Mr Picardo told the Chronicle at the time.
In the interview with El Pais, Mr Albares was asked to set out Spainâs red lines.
âSpain does not renounce its claim to sovereignty, but it's also a red line for me that the lives of the 300,000 residents of the Campo de Gibraltar improve,â he replied.
Mr Albares said the status of the 10,000 Spanish cross-border workers was protected by the UK/EU withdrawal agreement but stressed that âfor nowâ the UK remained intent on reaching a deal.
âThere was already a New Yearâs Eve pact [in 2020] that mentioned the presence of Spanish and Frontex [the European border agency] officers,â he said.
âAll of that was already agreed.â
And he added: âAt this historic moment, we need to be forward-thinking, set aside any hesitations, and move towards a new relationship.â
âFears, suspicions, and distrust must be left behind.â
