Gibraltar and Post-Brexit

Gibraltar Broadcasting Company – Review 2021

2021 was a busy year for the GBC News team, with major stories covered, such as the ongoing EU/ Spain/ UK negotiations on a Gibraltar ‘Brexit’ deal, as well as the Covid Pandemic. Both issues have dominated the headlines over the past twelve months. Review 2021 has been put together by senior members of the GBC News team including Christine Vasquez, Jonathan Scott, Jonathan Sacramento and Christina Cortes, and recaps on the stories that have been covered by GBC News since January last year.

Part 1
https://www.gbc.gi/tv/programmes/review-2021-1251/episode/review-2021-part-1-9172
(22min)

Part 2
https://www.gbc.gi/tv/programmes/review-2021-1251/episode/review-2021-part-2-9173
(22min)

1 Like

Part 3

https://www.gbc.gi/tv/programmes/review-2021-1251

(21min)

Gibraltar's businessmen are concerned about the possible introduction of VAT

https://noticiasgibraltar.es/gibraltar/noticias/empresarios-gibraltar-se-muestran-preocupados-por-la-posible-incorporacion-iva

The businessmen of Gibraltar, while waiting for the agreement to be finalised after Brexit on the relationship between the Rock and the European Union, have expressed their concern about the possible introduction of VAT, a tax that until now has had little impact on the internal trade of the Rock.

In recent days, the GSD, the main opposition party, has echoed the complaints from the Chamber of Commerce, although these are not the only opposing positions. "The problem is the lack of clarity and we know that this could happen, but now it is a question of making people aware of accepting something which, until now, was not a problem", said a director of one of Gibraltar's strongest companies, who also points to another aspect which, in this case, could significantly damage the Campo de Gibraltar.

"We will see how the ordinary citizen who goes to the shopping centres of La Línea, Algeciras or Los Barrios accepts it". Until now they paid the corresponding price in Spain, which was not usually very high for the prices and salaries of the Gibraltarians, asked for their ticket or invoice and when they passed through customs they knew that part of the payment would be refunded to their account, he explained.

For this reason, one of the key issues surrounding the implementation of VAT is "how the customs issue will affect daily consumption, the goods that enter Gibraltar and, above all, the arrival of products to companies". In this sense, they already point out that the current health crisis is affecting, for example, the automobile sector. "In recent months, car sales have not been high, but not because of a lack of orders, but because of a lack of vehicles," sources in the sector told Gibraltar News.

However, both citizens and companies prefer to keep a "cautious wait in anticipation of more details and above all the final resolution of the Treaty".

2 Likes

The Minister for Economic Development has stressed that Gibraltar’s future relationship with the EU and Spain will NOT see it being part of the Customs Union. Asked about the negotiations for a future relationship Treaty, Sir Joe Bossano told us there will have to be an evaluation - with the business community - of the importance of freedom of movement.

First, he told us categorically that Gibraltar will not have VAT, though there may be a level of import duty collected on importation which reflects VAT levels for different goods.

Sir Joe Bossano says Gibraltar will NOT be part of the Customs Union and will...

‘Brexit represents opportunity for the Crown Dependencies’

image

Professor Sutton was a former EU official and as a lawyer was immersed in EU law for nearly 40 years. He said it was not clear whether Brexit had yet had an adverse effect on financial or related services within the UK’s territories, Gibraltar excepted.

And while the EU will continue to deal with island issues through Westminster, Brexit did offer an opportunity for the Crown Dependencies to exercise a degree of choice over their direction.

‘All UK territories are “autonomous” in the sense that they are not bound, as a matter of law, by legislation adopted in the UK,’ he wrote.

‘Territories such as Jersey, Bermuda or Gibraltar are therefore free to determine for themselves the extent to which they follow the UK, EU or their own standards in areas such as insurance and asset management.’

‘Brexit represents opportunity for the Crown Dependencies’ | Guernsey Press

Gibi Jedi

Gibraltar reciprocates as local hauliers face additional post-Brexit bureaucracy in Spain

9th February 2022

European Union hauliers, including those from Spain, will require a permit to operate in Gibraltar, the Gibraltar Government said on Tuesday, adding the move was reciprocal in response to changes affecting Gibraltar-registered commercial vehicles.

The Government said drivers of Gibraltar-registered commercial vehicles had been given notice that they will need a permit, or an employment contract in Spain, to continue operating in Spain after March1, 2022.

It said this was as a consequence of Gibraltar’s departure from the European Union and the end of the transition period.

“In line with the policy of reciprocity, which is the accepted standard in international relations, the Government will also require European Union hauliers, including Spanish operators, to equally require a permit in order to operate in Gibraltar,” No.6 Convent Place said.

“An information leaflet will be distributed to all commercial vehicles coming in through the border which will spell out, in different languages, the reason for the change in approach and the steps that they need to take in order to regularise their position.”

No.6 said a short period of adjustment would be permitted in order to enable EU hauliers to comply with the arrangements.

It added the “logical consequence” of the change would be that hauliers without a permit would be required to unload their goods at the border and transfer the load to a Gibraltar-registered company for onwards local delivery inside Gibraltar.

The end of the EU legal framework for the carriage of goods and passengers has led the United Kingdom to apply for the extension to Gibraltar of the relevant Council of Europe -not EU - international conventions.

These have been held up in the Council of Europe even though the issue could have been resolved “in an instant” through such extensions, the Gibraltar Government said.

“The Government has been in contact with Gibraltar’s operators and business organisations since our departure from the European Union, in the run-up to the end of the transition period, in order to appraise them of the situation,” No.6 added in a statement.

“There are 13 road haulage companies in Gibraltar with 319 employees of whom 230 are EU or Spanish citizens.”

“This is clearly not in the interests of anyone and the matter has been taken up with the relevant authorities in the UK and Spain.”

Today we wake up to the news that our GSLP-Liberal Alliance Government have imposed, as from 1st March 2022, on EU hauliers, which will include those from Spain, the need to have a permit to operate in Gibraltar. That seems unwise, as it will cause self-harm.

It has the potential of bureaucratically impeding and undermining our wholesale and retail trade from, and of increasing the cost of, maintaining essentials, stocks, and goods. We would all suffer from any shortages.

Our Government should think of not cutting our nose to spite our face. We should be selfish and self-centred, and ensure that we do what is best for ourselves, irrespective of what the EU obliges Spain to do. Otherwise, the increased delay and cost caused by our Government’s action will fall on each of us, or encourage us to make our purchases in Spain, at a cheaper cost.

A question that arises is, why were international conventions, which would have avoided the problem, not extended to Gibraltar by the UK already?

Continued at link.

1 Like

Residents of Gibraltar were warned on Thursday it was “of fundamental importance” that they prepare for the possibility that ongoing negotiations for a UK/EU treaty fail to reach a final agreement.

The stark warning was set out in a 40-page booklet on planning for a so-called “non-negotiated outcome”.

Until now, bridging measures implemented by Spain pending the outcome of treaty talks have softened the impact on Gibraltarians of the inevitable consequences of Brexit after the end of the transition period on January 31, 2021.

But without an agreement, Gibraltar would become a third country for the EU, meaning increased bureaucracy and the prospect, in particular, of hefty delays at the border arising from systematically tighter immigration controls.

The booklet leaves no doubt as to the dire impact of a non-negotiated outcome on many aspects of life that are currently taken for granted.

As third-country nationals, Gibraltarians with British passports would have a cap on the amount of time they could spend in the EU’s Schengen area, namely 90 days in any 180-day period.

That would place limits on regular crossings into Spain and would impact people with second homes in Spain unless they are EU nationals or resident there.

It would also have implication on everything ranging from accessing emergency healthcare to studying and working in the EU.

“It is of fundamental importance for citizens, on the basis of the guidance provided, to prepare themselves for the possibility of NNO,” the booklet says.

“This will mitigate the consequences of not being able to agree a treaty to the greatest extent possible.”

“It will clearly be impossible to mitigate those effects completely because in many cases the new situation will simply reflect life outside the EU."

Gibraltar has conducted extensive planning for a no deal outcome and in many areas such as food imports and waste management already operates as a non-EU third country.

But it is perhaps in the area of border fluidity and immigration controls that the worst impacts will be felt.

The government said frontier workers should prepare for lengthy delays at the border particularly at peak times, and should explore with employers the possibility of staggering shifts to avoid rush-hour periods.

And it warned too that whatever controls and checks were imposed on Gibraltarians entering the EU would be reciprocated on this side of the border, raising the prospect of tit-for-tat measures that would impact most on regular commuters including those who cross the border for their livelihoods.

“In the event of a NNO the Government will require every frontier worker to comply with equivalent requirements to those imposed on Gibraltar residents to cross to Spain,” the leaflet states.

“This is the principle of ‘reciprocity’ which is commonly accepted in international relations.”

“As a result, cross frontier workers who are not covered by the Withdrawal Agreement should ensure they have passports available for inspection on entry into Gibraltar.”

“Those who are covered by the Withdrawal Agreement will have to demonstrate this through the daily provision of valid travel and identity documents also.”

Despite the booklet’s bleak contents, the Gibraltar Government said it remained committed to negotiating a treaty based on the New Year’s Eve political framework agreement.

Negotiators have already concluded five rounds of talks, with at least one more round scheduled before the March date by which the UK, with Gibraltar, and the EU hope to have concluded a deal.

For now, all sides have signalled progress in talks that all agree have been held in a constructive spirit.

But likewise all side have signalled too that there remain complex areas of disagreement to resolve, although the detail of those discussions has been kept tightly under wraps for now.

The negotiators hope to reach an agreement by March allowing a common travel area between Gibraltar and the Schengen zone.

Spain, as neighbouring country, would take responsibility on behalf of the EU for Schengen immigration checks in Gibraltar, but Frontex officers would carry out the actual physical controls on the ground, at least for the first four years.

There is also the possibility of a bespoke arrangement on customs.

In a joint foreword to the booklet, Chief Minister Fabian Picardo and Deputy Chief Minister Dr Joseph Garcia said Gibraltar would continue to strive for a deal.

“Negotiations have taken place in a constructive and cooperative atmosphere and, whilst progress has been made, discussions need to resume in order for the parties to attempt to resolve the complex issues which remain outstanding,” they wrote.

“Until this treaty is negotiated and until it enters into force Gibraltar will be treated as a third country with respect to the EU for all intents and purposes.”

“However, the full effect of this is currently tempered by a number of time-limited bridging measures which govern Gibraltar’s relationship with Spain in specific areas.”

“The Government remains committed to the framework agreement concluded together with the United Kingdom and Spain as the way forward.”

“However, since the UK or Gibraltar would never accept an agreement which would sacrifice fundamentals or put Gibraltar’s future prosperity in jeopardy, we must also be ready to walk away.”

“Therefore we must plan for an agreement and for no agreement at the same time.”

The Guidance to Citizens is now available on-line here and a hard copy will be printed and distributed to households in Gibraltar shortly.

Preparing for the possibility of a
“Non-Negotiated Outcome”

1 Like

Verdemar calls on the Junta to act on the accumulation of rubbish in Gibraltar

The environmental group hopes for solutions before the Strait of Gibraltar is affected by the situation.

Verdemar the environmental group from the Campo de Gibraltar asks the Junta de Andalucía whether it "is waiting for the plastic waste" accumulated in Gibraltar "to reach the Strait to solve the problem", regarding the rubbish piled up on the eastern side of the Rock.

"We call for a rapid solution to the rubbish accumulating on the eastern side of Gibraltar," the environmentalists insist in a note.

"Gibraltar has been managing solid urban waste for decades in the South of Europe Environmental Complex in Los Barrios", recalls the organisation. "For the last 15 days it has been accumulating by the sea, to the east of the rock of Gibraltar due to poor administrative management," they point out.

According to the ecologists, Gibraltar has been managing "for years 30,000 tonnes of domestic waste per year at the Urban Solid Waste Treatment Plant in Majadal de Bustos", where the South of Europe Environmental Complex is located.

"We denounce once again that more than 3,000 tonnes of solid urban waste is accumulating on the beach east of Gibraltar and the Junta de Andalucía is only putting obstacles in the way of solving the problem," laments Verdemar.

"These images take us back to the 1990s, when the management of solid urban waste in Gibraltar was out of control", insists Verdemar Ecologists in Action, which makes "a call to the administration to reach an agreement that guarantees good traceability of this waste before it becomes an environmental problem and we see all kinds of rubbish in the Strait of Gibraltar".

"We continue to believe that solving the problem by shipment to the UK will leave a major ecological footprint," they say.

The Gibraltar Government has begun shredding and compacting rubbish amid continued delays obtaining permits to export it to Spanish recycling centres.

Up to 6,000 tons of municipal waste and bulky items have built up in recent weeks due to delays with the paperwork, which arise as a result of Gibraltar’s departure from the EU.

Officials here expect the issue to be resolved shortly but have in any case commenced shredding the waste in the meantime, allowing for storage in tunnels until it can be exported.

This is the first time that machinery to shred the waste, compact it and package it into bales has been used since it was purchased under a 2019 agreement with the UK Government, which funded the £862,000 kit as part of contingency plans for a no deal Brexit.

“The shredding of rubbish has now commenced and the paperwork for its exportation is still awaited and is expected shortly,” a spokesperson for the Department of Environment said.

“A number of tunnels and vaults inside the Rock have been identified for storage purposes in the meantime while the situation is resolved.”

The Department of Environment estimates that the backlog of municipal solid waste is between 2,800 and 3,000 tons, while the pile-up of bulk items is between 2,400 and 3,000 tons.

Municipal waste from Gibraltar was exported under the EU legal framework while Gibraltar was part of the European Union.

After Brexit and the end of the transition period, Gibraltar moved to an alternative legal framework provided under international conventions.

“This framework is different and involves processes and procedures which take more time,” the spokesperson told the Chronicle.

“The export of rubbish is currently awaiting the finalisation and renewal of paperwork and approvals which has suffered some delays.”

Gibraltar’s rubbish is exported to a recycling plant in the Campo de Gibraltar under a contract worth over 1.2m euros annually with Arcgisa, the public entity that handles the Campo’s municipal waste.

Arcgisa handles over 30,000 tons of waste from Gibraltar every year.

In the past, clearance under the EU framework was granted by the Junta de Andalucia and was a relatively simple process that was tried and tested.

The Chronicle understands the delays with the new paperwork arose because while the waste is treated initially in the Campo site, it is then broken up and sent to other recycling centres in different parts of Spain.

Under the new authorisation framework outside the EU, regional authorities in each of those sites must submit paperwork in order for the exports to be cleared by central authorities in Madrid, making the process more cumbersome and bureaucratic.

1 Like

Visual of the Rubbish

This could act as a wake-up call to Gibraltarians.

It could lead to something good – where Gibraltarians and Gibraltar start taking care of their own mess.

Assess the amount of trash they produce; and develop steps to be done about it – without relying on dumping their own-trash on the Campo or other countries.

China decided a few years ago to stop being the dumping ground of The West. The recyclables were contaminated with hazardeous materials. The West found other countries to take the trash, but is that right? Everyone talks a good "green game" but they aren't walking the walk.

China No Longer Wants Your Trash. Here's Why That's Potentially Disastrous.. Mere weeks after the ban took effect, waste management facilities in several countries, including the U.S., Canada, the U.K. and Germany are groaning under the weight of trash that no one seems to know what to do with.

Recycling in Gibraltar has been available for quite some time, but so many people still bin what can be recycled – http://www.thinkinggreen.gov.gi/waste/recycling.
Gibraltar's Ecoparkhttp://www.thinkinggreen.gov.gi/waste/local-waste-centres

There are cardboard boxes and other recyclables in the video. Perhaps, since these are also sent to Spain, there may be similar issues in their disposal. Is the government just compacting all items (even recyclables) together? What about all the talk about green and sustainable Gibraltar? Where does that come into play – or is that really about something else?

Instead of the government selling real-estate to foreign investors, maybe they should assess how to deal with their own trash by allotting space to manage it.

Even food scraps can be turned into biodiesel – and that's actually green. Whereas, the forests around the world they are decimating to make biodisel is not really green.

Each individual must do their part, avoid being lazy and putting in the bin what can be recycled. The government should not have to make individuals do the right thing. Likewise, the government needs to provide a way to manage it, where everyone and The Rock benefits.

3 Likes

Lorries carrying waste for export have been able to leave Gibraltar today for the first time since the start of the year, with the necessary documentation now in place.

In response to GBC questions, the Government confirmed that the administrative process is now complete, with the trans-frontier shipment certification signed.

Lorries belonging to private contractor Monteverde departed the Rock today; GBC understands more than six thousand tonnes of household waste are to be removed, with 16 trucks to make multiple trips to the Complejo Medioambiental Surde Europa in Los Barrios over coming days.

The delay has been attributed to extra paperwork following Brexit, with waste having accumulated at the tip on Europa Advance Road as a result.

2 Likes

Gibraltar prepares its citizens for brexit no deal as negotiations continue

https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2022/03/04/gibraltar-prepares-its-citizens-for-brexit-no-deal-as-negotiations-continue/

deal

deal 2

Access the .pdf: Here

The sixth round of EU-UK Gibexit talks have ended, with two rumours at each end of the spectrum. On the one hand we have the belief of some that a ‘deal’ is done; at the other end those who say a ‘deal’ is hugely distant. But reality is that silence is what reigns.

The truth is that we need to wait and see, in the uncertainty that causes worry.

DONE ‘DEAL’

The rumour that a ‘deal’ is done provides no detail, simply that it is all done and dusted, and it will be announced in a matter of weeks. It is a belief which is supported by various statements and theories.

The greatest support for this contention comes from the recent declaration of the Spanish Foreign Minister, Jose Manuel, Albares, who said, in mid-February, that a ‘deal’ was “almost 99% ready”. He safeguarded his position by saying that, inevitably, the final 1% of any treaty negotiation invariably proved the most difficult.

The other theory doing the rounds is that the news about the potential bad effects of ‘no deal’, are being widely aired in Gibraltar by the Government, which many think is intended to create a foundation to ‘sell’ any ‘deal’ that is announced, by establishing how all those bad outcomes, if there were to be ‘no deal’, will be avoided.

NO ‘DEAL’

The other camp is firm that talks are going badly with many an issue still far from agreement.

The main one is how to overcome all computations necessary to allow for a free flow of persons across the border. It is an issue that carries with it, it is said, the difficulty of how to deal with military personal who access Gibraltar.

Another is combining agreements over Gibraltar without complicating concerns that affect the Irish border with Northern Ireland. There are negotiators who are dealing with both matters. They are, consequently, very conscious not to confound one with the other.

TIME RUNNING OUT?

What is clear is that self-imposed timetables to conclude negotiations have not been met in the past, and are unlikely to be met once again. The talk was that negotiations would be finalised by the end of March. We are three weeks away from that date with no news.

The reality is that it is a deadline that is likely not going to be met, unless the theory, about the propaganda campaign to make a ‘deal’ look good by highlighting the disaster that ‘no deal’ would bring about, is right, and an announcement is made shortly, just prior to the Easter break.

FURTHER EXTENSIONS?

There is no talk, currently, of extending the period for negotiating a Gibexit treaty. If EU negotiators end the present rounds, believing there is no way forward open, then the likelihood of a further extension diminishes. That in turn must be balanced with two considerations.

One is that the sad and painful events between Russia and the Ukraine have come about. Undoubtedly that must be taking up the time of senior politicians and public servants of both the EU and the UK. Accordingly, talks on Gibexit may not have advanced as far as hoped, so an extension is called for.

The other is that ‘no deal’ will have huge adverse effects on the Campo de Gibraltar and its inhabitants, who have a massive economic dependence on a free-flowing frontier. The necessity of a ‘deal’ for them cannot be ignored by Spain, and in turn by the EU.

An extension to the time for negotiating a treaty must be on the cards, unless there is a view formed that ‘no deal’ can be the only outcome. It is difficult to believe that such a final view will be formed at this stage.

UNSATISFACTORY OUTCOME

If indeed ‘no deal’ is the expected outcome, then that should be said, or an announcement made to the effect that, were that to be the outcome, a transitional period of several months would be put in place.

A transitional period is necessary to allow arrangements to be organised, to lessen and alleviate the effects on all, including Spanish cross-frontier workers, of a ‘no deal’.

In the meantime, we, in the immediacy of both sides of the frontier, all live a life of the uncertainty caused by not knowing.

Spain will allow 6,000 tons of rubbish from Gibraltar to be disposed of in Cadiz

Rubbish will be transferred from Gibraltar to a landfill in the Cadiz municipality of Los Barrios.

El Peñon has sent 30,000 tons of rubbish to the Los Barrios landfill every year for decades, but since the beginning of 2022 it has piled up 6,000 tons of waste on its east face, and tunnels, due to the impossibility of it crossing the border.

This circumstance has created the risk of the rubbish ending up in the sea... and may cause “an episode of environmental pollution for the entire bay”.

Read more.

1 Like

If there is ‘no deal’ between the EU and the UK over Gibraltar, the Government must carefully consider the adverse effects on Gibraltar of blindly sticking to the principle of ‘reciprocity’, by applying overly strict entry and exit controls at the border. That must be so despite that ‘reciprocity’ is a commonly accepted principle in international relations.

The last thing we should want is ‘to cut our nose to spite our face’. Our Government must act wisely to ensure that any measures it takes do not cause us avoidable harm. It is that wisdom that must be driving the desire to keep talking to reach a ‘deal’, and our side of the equation should not be sacrificed, if there is ‘no deal’.

It must, or should, take decisions on the grounds of what is best, not necessarily by a pointless application of the principle of ‘reciprocity’. Prejudices must be put aside to ensure that measures taken here are those that best suit our own interests. We must be selfish. We should do all that is in our power to facilitate cross-border access to all.

THE ‘NO DEAL’ SCENE

There is no better summary of what will happen if there is ‘no deal’ than that provided by the Chief Minister and the Deputy Chief Minister in the booklet “Guidance to Citizens”, recently published by the GSLP-Liberal Government (Booklet).

Any ‘deal’ would be contained in a treaty to be entered between the EU and the UK over Gibraltar (treaty). They say,” Until this treaty is negotiated and until it enters into force Gibraltar will be treated as a third-country with respect to the EU for all intents and purposes.”

That has not fully happened yet because, as they go on to say, “the full effect of this is currently tempered by a number of time-limited bridging measures which govern Gibraltar’s relationship with Spain in specific areas.”

Time limits on those are soon coming up. The hope is that they will be extended whilst any talks aimed at leading to the treaty continue.

FRONTIER WORKER BORDER CONTROLS

We are told in the Booklet, “that if ‘reciprocity’ is applied, the Government would insist that all frontier workers fulfil the same conditions as those which are imposed under EU law on residents of Gibraltar crossing into the Schengen area at the border with Spain.”

Surely, it is us who need and benefit from those workers? The wisdom of making life difficult for frontier workers, who are needed here, is questionable, therefore. We would be self-harming without the possibility of any gain, as the likelihood of the EU changing a position at the border, which it is obliged by its laws to impose, is impractical and inconceivable.

Irrespective of whatever regime must be imposed at the border under EU law, surely, Gibraltar should want to facilitate that which is in its own best interests, by not imposing added hurdles in the way of frontier workers.

It is, surely, insufficient that the Government should be advising that “Frontier workers who live in Spain and work in Gibraltar are encouraged to discuss any anticipated difficulties with employers in advance so that the effect of any delays can be mitigated to the maximum extent possible. This could involve structuring shift patterns in order to avoid peak crossing times.”

The Government should surely be taking measures to ease, as much as possible, any burden that ‘no deal’ would bring on these workers. In that way it would be benefitting Gibraltar and its economy.

VISITOR BORDER CONTROLS

The same self-harm would come about if those same border controls were to be imposed by Gibraltar on any visitor, tourist, coming into or leaving Gibraltar. Surely, we would want to make that passage as easy as possible to encourage as many people as possible to come to Gibraltar.

In that way we would be supporting our economy hugely, and in turn our much-needed public finances.

Our elected governments should be, and undoubtedly must be, motivated to govern in a manner which facilitates as much business as possible for our taxis, our shops, our restaurants, and all other businesses for the wider benefit of our economy and in turn our public finances.

A ’DEAL’ IS BEST

Undoubtedly a ‘deal’ is the best way forward. But ‘no deal’ must be dealt with intelligently and keeping constantly in mind what is best for Gibraltar, and not acting emotionally on a ‘tit-for-tat’ basis.

It is undoubtedly reassuring that the Government remains committed to the talks that will hopefully lead to the treaty. There is little doubt that a favourable outcome in those negotiations is what would benefit most people, both in Gibraltar and in the Campo de Gibraltar.

3 Likes

Ministerial reshuffle: Isola is new Health Minister, Sacramento to establish an Anti-Corruption Authority & Linares now involved in industrial relations in what is expected to be most challenging financial year for Government since 1967

Today was the first meeting of Cabinet in the new financial year and Fabian Picardo expects it to be the most challenging year for elected representatives since the Franco restrictions started in 1967 and the frontier closed in 1969.

Health Ministry changes, Anti-Corruption Authority to be created

The Chief Minister said the GHA will “now” be entirely independently run, with Mr Isola taking “full policy responsibility”.

Fabian Picardo said Samantha Sacramento “gave everything she had to the Health Authority at the worst time in our history and bringing decision making on Health and Civil Contingencies together at the most stressful time in our history”.

Ms Sacramento will take over a “super-regulatory ministry”, including the Regulatory Authority and Town Planning, as well as the creation of a new “Anti-Corruption Authority”, with a Bill “to be published in the coming weeks”.

Linares now involved in industrial relations

Steven Linares takes on some of the responsibility for industrial relations, though decisions with any financial implications would have to be referred to Sir Joe Bossano as Minister for Financial Stability and then the Chief Minister as Minister for Finance. Mr Picardo says he himself will “continue to handle matters of industrial relations which have general political importance, given these will inevitably have financial implications”.

A team that 'plays to its strengths' at what is set to be a difficult year

The idea is that the Chief Minister will free up some of his time to pursue “the wider issues of our relationship with the United Kingdom, the European Union and Spain as we settle (into) the new reality of life in Gibraltar with or without a UK/EU Treaty.

Mr Picardo said he had to ensure his ministerial team plays to its strengths, given that the pandemic has ravaged public finances and there is a “potential for a hard-Brexit knock to our economy”.

Mr Picardo said it was not about honing a team to win an election, it was about honing a team to deliver the maximum possible for Gibraltar

Realities are dawning, it seems, on our Chief Minister in two important areas, one is Gibexit, the second, the outstanding urgency of keeping the promise, about corruption measures, made in the GSLP-Liberal Alliance manifesto; both matters are buried deep in a press statement, issued yesterday, about a minor ministerial reshuffle.

The first reality is the huge work necessary to meet the challenges of a Gibexit ‘deal’ or ‘no deal’.

The GSLP-Liberal Alliance Chief Minister, the Hon. Mr. Fabian Picardo now advocates that Gibraltar faces ‘doom and gloom’. He blames Brexit and the Covid pandemic. The reality is that, whilst those affect hugely, the extravagant way governments, especially the GSLP-Liberal Alliance, have misspent and borrowed excessively since 1998 and before Brexit and the pandemic, have made matters hugely worse.

How one wishes, now, for Sir Joseph Bossano’s ‘rainy day’ fund’. Those were the days of cautious financial administration. His silence on subject right now is surprising, beyond him having referred, on one occasion, to the current financial situation being unsustainable.

The second reality, hidden within the superficial ministerial reshuffle announced, is the intention to pass laws to create, at last, the promised Anti-Corruption Authority.

GIBEXIT AND GSLP-LIBERAL ‘DOOM and GLOOM’?

Continued at link.

1 Like

Picardo waking up or being awakened?...
"He goes on to paint an even more worrying picture, “It will be, in financial terms, probably the most challenging year that elected politicians representing the civilian population of Gibraltar, since the Franco restrictions started in 1967 and the frontier closed in 1969. In those days, however, we enjoyed the benefits of the UK policy of “support and sustain. That is not the situation today”;
not that “elected politicians” are to blame,
but rather the governments from time to time, his GSLP-Liberal Alliance being the relevant one now.

Now a word from The TRUTH ( )

(What do you think the rest of the world, who have been forced to adopt democracy, instead of The Covenant, are going to do when they find-out it doesn't work and that the West knew that, before it forced them to adopt it? And who are they going to quite rightly blame for all of their suffering? YOU. Then what will they do? Armageddon.)

https://jahtruth.net/democra.htm

"The second reality, hidden within the superficial ministerial reshuffle announced, is the intention to pass laws to create, at last, the promised Anti-Corruption Authority."

Sounds like another bloviated NON ESSENTIAL Warren Commission, whose job it is, to cover up, not investigate.

So called authorities

Or how about that "body", so called 9/11 Commission, or ""Authority"
Look where that has lead us

politicians flushing you down the toilet|474x324,

Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.

https://www.corbettreport.com/911-a-conspiracy-theory/

Or how about those Authorities that investigated 7/7 London Bombings.
What a joke:
A true investigation into the atrocities committed on 7/7 can be seen here:
(Which leads us on the path to The TRUTH, The LIGHT)
77 Ripple Effect - Version 3

and here:

The list is endless throughout history, never ending crimes against humanity to keep those in power and the rest of humanity in poverty as slaves.

And this is what Almighty God has to say about it:

Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the "I AM" thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that [are] about me;
17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set [him] king over thee, whom the "I AM" thy God shall choose: [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger (a Gentile) over thee, which [is] not thy brother.
17:16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt (slavery - employment under man-made laws), to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the "I AM" hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.
17:17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.
17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this Law in a book out of [that which is] before the priests the Levites (The Torah):
17:19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the "I AM" his God, to keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes, to DO them:
17:20 That his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, and that he turn NOT aside from the Commandment (The Covenant), [to] the right hand (right-wing politics), or [to] the left (left-wing politics): to the end that he may prolong [his] days in his kingdom, he, and his children, in the midst of Israel.

So, is Picardo waking up? I'll say he is, when he realizes, Christ the Light of the World will illuminate all with His brightness from Gibraltar.
When Picardo helps The Lord to re instate Gods Royal Laws Of Liberty, starting in Gibraltar, and when he fights for the Kingdom on Gods side and even pethaps shares his new found freedom on this site, then I will say Picardo is waking up.

3 Likes