Apparently not, unfortunately, as THEY are too busy hanging up rainbow flags everywhere, instead of researching into the damaging effects of the jab and possibly more so for the younger generation.
2nd July 2021
The Minister for Equality, Samantha Sacramento, has spoken of her disappointment to see how a minority in the local community expressed anger towards the initiatives that were put into place to mark Pride Month on the Rock.
In response to the criticism, Ms Sacramento said that more awareness, education and work was needed to encourage greater acceptance of all members of the community.
“I find it incredible that people felt so strongly and were so offended,” she said.
“This demonstrated to us the need to have this trigger and this conversation.”
“It tells us that we have to reach out further and continue our education.”
Ms Sacramento also called for more respect towards people and their fundamental rights.
“In Gibraltar, everyone’s a Gibraltarian and everyone has rights and we have to be respectful of people’s rights.”
She added that the negative responses motivate her to work even harder towards inclusion for all.
Ms Sacramento told the Chronicle that talking is key in educating and creating awareness.
“That’s important, the fact that people are asking questions is part of the process, because this has to be a conversation, and education and awareness is about getting people talking,” she said.
In an attempt to continue creating awareness throughout the community, the pelican crossings displaying LGBTQ+ symbols have been continued for the foreseeable future.
An online survey for members of the LGBTQ+ community was also recently announced.
Ms Sacramento encouraged people to participate and voice their opinions and concerns.
“I want to hear from them, what their experiences are like, where they are throughout the different services that we provide, I want them to tell me what more I can do”, she said.
Ms Sacramento added that the support for Pride Month by most of the community was encouraging and that the Government continued to work towards creating awareness, building on a foundation of important legislative change over recent years.
“I am happy that Pride has been welcomed and embraced, the symbolism is very positive,” she said.
“I think this year really symbolises the journey we have been on and there has been so much work done that we forget it, but it’s all been the foundation blocks to have us where we are today”
“I think that this year it has been abundantly clear that, as a government, we are supportive of LGBTQ+ rights”, she added.
Nevertheless good to see there is at least some resistance to this promotion of clearly not gay people.
"Gay-homosexual - denotes someone who is unhappy with their gender and wants to pretend to be the opposite gender or to have a relationship with someone of the same gender because they are not happy with normality, so gay, which really means happy, is the opposite of its definition."
How Pfizer Manipulated COVID Vaccine Trial Protocols To Obtain Emergency FDA Authorisation For Children
Analysis and comparison of the review document submitted by Pfizer to the US Food and Drug Administration, on the basis of which the FDA gave the green light to expand the emergency permit for vaccination also for children aged 12-15 (1), as opposed to the study protocol in children (2, 3), reveal concerning findings, including violations of the protocol established by Pfizer itself, and no less serious, designing the trial protocol in a way that will allow the company to present as positive findings as possible in terms of vaccine safety in children.
The UK Government's chief medical adviser has warned that rates of long COVID are likely to increase, particularly among young people. Long COVID is the term for long-lasting health effects after having contracted COVID, even if the infection itself has passed.
Professor Chris Whitty said the two ways to prevent this are to keep COVID rates down, and to make sure everyone is vaccinated so they get a mild version of the disease. His concerns were echoed by the head of NHS membership organisation NHS Providers, who said there were concerns over the number of unvaccinated young people getting mild symptoms upon first contracting the disease, but then developing much more severe long COVID-type symptoms afterwards.
Chris Hopson said the long-term health consequences are not yet fully understood, so we all need to be careful and remain aware of the risks.
It seems the jab-happy medical tyrants are hell-bent on creating a reason to get those under 12 vaccinated.
How long did it really take the government to approve the experimental jab for those 12 and over? Not long.
And while the UK and Gibraltar government say they will wait on JVCI's recommendation to do so, do we really think that JVCI's recommendation will take? Current headlines read they are not recommending it; and this may cause people to let their guards down.
LucijaTomljenovic has presented documentation which appears to show that the Joint Committee of Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) has made continuous efforts over many years to withhold critical data from parents and health practitioners on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations in order to reach overall vaccination rates which the JCVI deemed necessary for “herd immunity,” a vaccination concept which does not rest on solid scientific evidence – Vaccine-injured children: a UK tale of neglect, corruption and cover-up? – UK Reloaded
How much of JCVI's weighing back and fro is "just for show".
Propaganda to go for the children is increasing - from them being blamed for the next wave to "protecting" them from this thing called "long covid" (What ever happened to the common cold/flu?).
Look at the JVCI's argument for delaying the jabs for those under 12. It's weak and given enough time they will "work it out" that the benefits of jabbing them outweigh the risks. Evil people:
For a health system to offer any vaccine to a child, two key ethical questions must be asked. First, do the benefits outweigh the risks? Second, if the vaccine is in short supply, does someone else need it more? Careful attention to both questions suggests that we should not yet roll out covid-19 vaccination to otherwise healthy children.
Is that the only key ethical questions they can come up with? Public health officials look at a benefits/risks assessment, which means a certain number can be harmed and it's still considered a "good" thing. So when your child is the one paralyzed from the jab, you should think that is is for the good of all. Next, they think about the supply of jabs. Seriously? If this thing actually protected children, you'd think they'd be prioritized. Besides, they have other means to programme children without giving them this dangerous jab. It's been done in the schools for years.
Covid-19 vaccines in adults have been remarkably effective.
What a bold-face LIE. Keep up on the negative adverse reactions from Yellowcard. Just because MSM isn't covering them, doesn't mean you can't find the information.
There is good reason to expect that the same will be true in children.
That's conjecture, but from a medical official is sounds plausible, right?
First, we know less about the risks. Randomised trials to date have given vaccines to only about 3500 adolescents. These trials are not designed to identify rare side effects. For example, the US government’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recently identified a risk of myocarditis in adolescents who have received mRNA based covid-19 vaccines an estimated 56-69 cases per million vaccine doses. We do not know whether other complications will emerge.
Exactly, they don't know. These are experimental jabs and trials aren't over for the world population until 2023.
Second, the potential benefit in children is much smaller. Most children who get covid-19 have mild illness. There are low risks of hospital admission and death (around two per million children in the UK), as well as rare multisystem inflammatory syndrome.
They know children don't really suffer. That's why the propaganda is heightened with variants and long-Covid.
However, serious illness from covid is much less common than in adults. Moreover, young children and schools seem to play a limited role in transmission. Vaccination of children would have marginal benefit in protecting others, particularly once people at higher risk are immunised.
Please remember this stance – because it will change, like they changed it about pregnant women and like they did about wearing face-masks.
There are also indirect effects (for example, interrupted education) and potential long covid.
Pulling out a reason that has nothing to do with their health, which they can weigh toward the benefits of jabbing the young. If they really were concerned with them missing school, why the lockdowns, which has proven to be about control not health; and children are suffering in other ways because of lockdowns, especially mentally.
They then plant "long covid" as a reason to jab the young. And Gibraltar's Sohail Bhatti does his evil part by planting that ideal on The Rock.
Now read this carefully:
Before we roll out a covid-19 vaccine for children, we should scrutinise safety data carefully and wait if there is any uncertainty. Crucially, if reports of serious complications arise they could harm our wider immunisation programme. Community confidence in vaccination can be easily threatened, leading to surges in vaccine preventable disease.
Since they don't know – if children start dropping like the elderly; if they start getting sicker; if their immune systems are weakened, compromised, the health tyrants aren't going to be able to explain these occurrences away like they did with the elderly. They might not be able to do the damage control of the vaccines being related to the adverse reactions, which means they are scared of public reaction – maybe people coming after them with pitchforks.
And look at what they are really concerned with – Crucially, if reports of serious complications arise they could harm our wider immunisation programme. Community confidence in vaccination can be easily threatened – isn't that what it boils down to?
They had to pull out all stops to come up with a reason that 18-year-old Camilla Canepa, from San Martino, didn't die of the vaccine (although they halted the AZ jab for those under 60 afterwards); and that may be the official narrative, but one should know better by now. This healthy 18-year old experienced death by injection.
Then, they bring up vax-inequity. Blah-blah-blah.
Then main point is they've got to get the other groups done first, because they know recommending it for this this young age group could have disastrous effects on their worldwide jab programme which started taking out the weak, poor, vulnerable and elderly in true eugenic-fashion.
Governments follow their health advisors and their health advisors follow Big Pharma – so how long will it take for them to change their stance? Not long, especially when their goal is to jab school children this Autumn.
Parents might find this document useful –
especially because they are letting children make health decisions after they've been programmed to believe Big-Brother and the Nanny-State in school settings:
Gillick Competence in the Age of Covid19: Empowering Children To Make Informed Medical Decisions.
Dear@DOTS Good News : Standing for TRUTH is The Way.
This dad decided to stand for TRUTH, face his test instead of taking the easy way out, caving into their satanic lies and deceit they offered him, (to abide by their fraudulent man-made-up unlawful rules) and it paid off well. God hears all, and knows all, and has the last say on all. What a lovely friend to have.
Taken from TWHOFTF 2:18 God, being the answer to every question, and the cure for every ill, is the ONLY thing that every SOUL needs, because with God, a soul has EVERYTHING it NEEDS (God being the source and supply of “Light” and everything good - Matt. 6:33& Luke 12:31). God is the best friend that any soul can ever have (for ever), and He is with you 24 hours a day, wherever you go. 2:19 No human friend can be with you 24 hours a day, every day, everywhere you go. Your human friends can not protect you from the Devil, and really, they are all bad, whereas God is good and the Ruler of the Universe, the most powerful “Force” in the whole of creation. What an amazing friend to have.
After 9 years of legal battles against the government of Canada, David Stephan announced on his Facebook Page this weekend that all charges had been dropped against him and his wife over the death of one of their children, where he and his wife were singled out by the Canadian government to be made an example of what happens when one dares to take on Big Pharma.
A champion of Health Freedom for years, when the young son of David and Collet Stephan died in what is now known as gross negligence by the medical system, the authorities tried to make an example of the Stephans for their way of life that included trusting God and generally not using pharmaceutical products when natural remedies were available.
They were charged with “failure to vaccinate” their child and blamed for his death, in the hopes of setting Canadian policy that failure to use Big Pharma sanctioned products by parents was the same thing as withholding the basic necessities of life from children, such as food, water, and air.
When their case against the Stephans did not go as they planned and massive corruption was uncovered, they turned to the corporate media in Canada to control the narrative, and for a while it worked, as millions of people, not only in Canada but around the world, vilified this couple and branded them as criminals for allegedly withholding proper medical treatment that they thought would have saved their child.
So effective was this negative media campaign against the Stephans, that the father, David, had to spend 21 days in solitary confinement in jail, as the other inmates considered him a child murderer and tried to kill him.
Health Impact News got involved in this story in 2016, and it was one of our most-read stories that year. We had already had our own run-in with officials in Alberta, Canada, on another story we had covered with a German-born teenager who had been medically kidnapped and held against his will and the will of his parents.
We exposed some of the corrupt officials involved with the teenager’s case, including their contact info which apparently hundreds of angry Canadians used to protest, which prompted the Solicitor General from the Department of Justice in Calgary to contact us and demand that we remove their information from our article.
We did not comply, and instead published his letter along with his contact info. (Story here.)
The German embassy eventually got involved in the case and was able reunite the family and fly them back to Germany in 2015. (Article here.)
So when we heard about what was happening to the Stephan family, I had my top reporter at that time contact them and get their side of the story, and we published it on the Health Impact News network.
By then the Canadian corporate media had vilified this family so much, that we literally received hundreds of complaints from people for standing up for the parents whom they believed were “child murderers” for allegedly failing to use modern medicine to heal their son.
But as the facts of the case unfolded, and as even the Supreme Court in Canada threw out their case for lack of evidence, it was obvious that there was massive corruption and cover-ups and that a failure to treat their son properly by paramedics when transporting him to the hospital is what really caused his death. (Canada is ran by communist, evidence **DNA test to prove Justin Trudeau is the son of Fidel Castro)
After this short update, the next day he explains the history of this case, and their plans going forward to seek justice, and to take a stand for the parental rights of all Canadians.
He explains how they offered him a plea deal in the beginning, where he could have admitted he was guilty of causing his son’s death, and that he only would have faced 18 months probation, and saved hundred of thousands of dollars in legal fees.
But he refused, choosing instead to take a stand for the truth, fighting for the parental rights of all parents in Canada, no matter what the cost.
If anyone backs vaccine for children, tell them to read this compelling scientific rebuttal
I want to share with you a report entitled Covid-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents. It is authored by Dr Byram Bridle of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance – a group of doctors, scientists and health practitioners committed to providing independent, evidence-based information about Covid.
Dr Bridle’s paper consists of more than 40 pages with appendices and it is worth reading thoroughly.
Click on link-box for more information.
Do Governments and health authorities always follow BigPharma?
Larissa Morgan, JD, MBE1 University Pennsylvania Law promotes propaganda and lies to vaccinate children without consent.
COVID-19 Vaccination of Minors Without Parental ConsentRespecting Emerging Autonomy and Advancing Public Health
In May 2021, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration in adolescents aged 12 to 15 years, with authorization for younger children expected later this year.1
This delusional Scribe states:
Despite reported clinical trial data indicating that the vaccine is safe and 100% efficacious for this age range, some parents and guardians may remain hesitant or outright opposed to vaccinating their children, particularly in politically and culturally conservative communities.2
Although COVID-19 illness is generally less severe in younger people, the disease has nonetheless caused substantial morbidity and more than 325 deaths among US children and adolescents, a burden of disease greater than that of many diseases for which vaccines are routinely recommended in this age group.6
She claims children are able to make comprehensive decisions on vaccines, yet the billions of adults who have opted for this vaccone, clearly weren't given the truth or facts of the matter.
Children and adolescents have the capacity to understand and reason about low-risk and high-benefit health care interventions. State laws should therefore authorize minors to consent to COVID-19 vaccination without parental permission.
Factors such as social pressure, emotional regulation, and planning skills affect minors’ ability to make well-considered choices. To account for these developmental facts, laws require parental permission and presume that parents know and will act in the best interest of their children. Despite this presumption, parents and minors might disagree about health care decisions. In the context of vaccination, some older minors may possess a more accurate understanding of the risks and benefits of a vaccine than their hesitant guardians. In younger children, and depending on the intervention, such cases present challenges and may entail judicial intervention.
Given the risks and the ongoing devastation of the pandemic, as well as the high benefit of vaccination for individual and public health, existing laws authorizing minors to consent to vaccines should be expanded to include COVID-19 vaccination and adopted nationally
Although the percentage of parents who may decline to vaccinate their children is currently unknown, the reported hesitancy among adults—including the age groups that include most parents of minors—suggests that this number is likely substantial.
23:13 But woe unto you, lawyers and (Pharisees - Farsis - Persian converts to Judaism, who were the) politicians, hypocrites! for ye shut up The Kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither allow ye them that are entering to go in (see Enoch 93:4-104:6).
23:14 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
23:15 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell-fire than yourselves.
23:27 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead [men's] bones, and of all corruption and filthiness.
23:28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and inequity.
Will they make sure children will be injected with Graphene through the flu vaccine?
The UK announced vulnerable children aged 12-15 will be offered Pfizer vaccine, but not healthy children –
The JCVI is not currently advising routine vaccination of children outside of these (vulnerable) groups, based on the current evidence.
Before you think children are out of the woods from this assault, a plan to push the FLU vaccine on them is instead in the works:
The UK government recently announced that there will be a mass vaccination programme against the flu, which will include children aged 2-15.
Kevin Courtney, Joint General Secretary of the [National Education Union NEU), said: “The welcomes the news that there will be a mass vaccination programme against the flu including of children.
... "long Covid providing another valid reason to vaccinate children against the flu."
Vaccinating children against the flu and Covid is pointless
Whilst the NEU states that Covid cases are highest amongst children and younger people, they fail to mention that children are the least likely age group to fall seriously unwell or die from the virus.
Graphene oxide gives a boost to new intranasal flu vaccine. Reasearchers created a two-dimensional nanomaterial (polyethyleneimine-functionalized graphene oxide nanoparticles) and found that it displayed potent adjuvant (immunoenhancing) effects on influenza vaccines delivered intranasally.
Did you think that only COVID vaccines contained graphene? Well, now this nanomaterial has been also found in the flu vaccine Vaxigrip Tetra. The same study by the Spanish researchers found graphene in this flu vaccine.
According to this article on Europe Reloaded, the researchers deduced "that the GO has been used in all vaccines, including tetanus, meningitis, children’s vaccines, etc., for some years."
La Quinta Columna says that GO was also in the 2018 flu vaccine, and that could account for why people exhibit magnetism despite not having had the “Covid” vaccine. This could also account for the high number of “flu” deaths after the 2018 flu vaccine campaign.
The outgoing Director of Public Health has warned of the panoply of issues which could possibly lead to complications for the management of Covid 19 in the autumn.
In an interview with GBC, Dr Sohail Bhatti, whose contract has not been extended, warned that the return of children to school will create new transmission bridges for the Delta variant, and this coupled with the return of other seasonal viruses, and an under stress health service, could be 'traumatic'.
Dr Bhatti said he was sad to leave the role, saying many things had been left unfinished, but also added he would not contradict the Chief Minister's reasons for his contract not having been renewed.
He spoke to Jonathan Sacramento who asked him what lessons had been learned about the management of the pandemic.
Better yet tell the schools and Universities this good information below, that pharmacy is witchcraft and vaccines are nothing but pure poison. Do you really think you’ve been told the whole truth about the pandemic? Do you think healthy debate and conversation are being encouraged — or stifled?
What we know now about COVID-19 and children:
Almost 100% of kids don’t suffer from severe COVID. In fact, many have no symptoms at all. Thus, they may have already had COVID which is another excellent reason not to get the vaccine.
A concerning number of young people, especially those under 30, are suffering from myocarditis (heart inflammation), blood clots, low platelets and more following COVID-19 vaccination.
The risks of COVID-19 vaccination adverse outcomes certainly outweigh the benefits to children and young adults who are considered low risk populations.
Parental rights to make independent, informed decisions regarding their children’s medical interventions, including vaccines, are being threatened.
Some scientists have raised concerns that the safety risk of COVID-19 vaccinations have been underestimated. As of July 16th, there have been 518,770 vaccine injuries including 11,940 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination.
Clinical trials in children and young adults are ongoing and will not be completed for at least one year.
Hundreds of colleges and universities embrace COVID vaccine mandates, but there is no reason why students and families can’t shun coercive educational institutions and forge their own educational path.
Not a single published study has demonstrated that patients who have had a prior COVID-19 infection benefit from the vaccination. So why recommend all kids get the shot?
Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of My Knowledge: because thou hast rejected My Knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to Me: seeing thou hast forgotten The Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
Once again, he proves himself redundant. If he is going to disseminate the same messages at the WHO, PHE, SAGE, JVCI, CHATHAM HOUSE – whatever the going propaganda is at the time – then why pay him? A secretary behind a desk could release what's coming down the pipeline just as easily. And none of this is Gibraltar specific, other than to tie what's happening in Gib and align it to Europe, UK, and the world - keeping in Lockstep with the Global plan.
Interestingly, there's two sides of the coin even among the jab-pushers, but I wouldn't put it past them to be doing this on purpose. Bhatti clearly belongs with the Neil Ferguson types and SAGE, who warn of gloom and doom, now with the so-called Indian-Delta variant.
On one side of the coin, you get Branch Covidians hollering the sky is falling, like with this article. A clear propaganda piece:
UK Education Secretary Gavin Williamson confirmed Tuesday that all remaining safety restrictions in schools will be lifted in England in September, even as the new deadly, more transmissible Delta variant spreads exponentially.
Just with that first paragraph, you can see where the article is going. Fact – the Delta variant isn't "deadly" or "new".
Note from article: At the beginning of the autumn term, secondary school children will have two lateral flow tests—which are not accurate—and then twice-weekly tests at home until the end of September.
On the other side of the coin, you actually get these messages:
• Establish a continuity plan for vaccination programmes, mental health programmes and psychological support for students, teachers and school staff during school discontinuity.
Sounds like the UK job openings for children's vaccination programme and even recent so-called efforts for mental health programmes are taking cues from the WHO.
Obviously, there is a lot of push back about jabbing children; and the science that says they do not need to be jabbed.
"Children do have mild symptoms usually, but they don't get very sick with the delta variant."
Read this from the mayor of London:
I am confident that PHE is providing the data that is needed, whilst maintaining the requirement to ensure medical confidentiality. We estimate that the delta variant now accounts for around 99% of cases in London, so it follows that virtually all outbreaks in schools will be attributable to this variant. PHE publishes regular technical briefings as well as weekly ‘flu and COVID-19 reports, both of which describe the number of outbreaks in schools that are managed by PHE. It is also possible to look at the rates of cases in school-aged children, as this data is publicly available as part of these reports. PHE confidentially shares information on outbreaks in schools in real time with local authorities and has good working relationships with local Directors of Public Health. Local schools’ use of the Department for Education’s COVID helpline is also shared confidentially with relevant local authorities. Concern about PHE schools data | Mayor's Question Time
So, yes, if the Delta-variant is being pushed as the main variant, of course, it's going to show up in the schools too. Does that mean everyone has to go off the deep end like Branch Covidians?
As far as Bhatti goes, again he is redundant – as perhaps his unfinished business deals with mandatory school vaccines. dA secretary can obtain the information from PHE (as the mayor described) and then the GoG can issue a press release and then The Chronicle can republish it, maybe with a coordinating photo.
The PCR test are not fit for purpose - except to make a casedemic and push jabs. They "Delta" cases would fall dramatically if they just stop testing healthy people. "Head of the Austrian Agency for Health and Safety of Food (AGES) Univ. Prof. In an interview, Franz Allerberger made people sit down and pay attention to it. According to him, the pandemic would not have been noticed if there was no PCR."
Because the Global Plan is a lockdown this Autumn, it's likely children and schools will be part of the propaganda. And they've got to come up with some clever tactics to convince everyone all children need the jab, even if it's a flu jab.
They’re coming for the children – JCVI recommends children are given the Covid-19 Jab despite the fact it is killing Children in the USA
By Daily Expose on August 4, 2021 • The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has recommended all children aged 16 and 17 receive the Pfizer Covid-19 injection, despite the fact real world data shows children in the USA have died due to the jab.
The new advice comes after originally only recommending children with disabilities should be offered a Covid-19 vaccine due to a lack of data to prove the benefits outweighed the risks.
The JCVI said in a statement issued on the 19th July 2021 that “children aged 12 to 15 with severe neuro-disabilities, Down’s syndrome, immunosuppression and multiple or severe learning disabilities, should be offered the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA Covid vaccine.
They also recommended that “children and young people aged 12 to 17 who live with an immunosuppressed person should be offered the vaccine”. The reason the JCVI give for this is that “immunosuppressed household contacts, who are at higher risk of serious disease from COVID-19 may not generate a full immune response to vaccination.” therefore in their opinion this will indirectly protect them.
The recommendation would not be possible without the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) first given emergency authorisation for the jab to be given to children aged 12 – 15.
Quite how the MHRA deemed the Pfizer mRNA jab to be safe for use in children, however, is anyone’s guess when you consider 86% of children who took part in the short two month trial suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer jab ranging from mild to extremely serious.
Perhaps money talks? Especially when it comes from a certain Mr Bill Gates who’s organisation is the primary funder of the MHRA to the tune of $3 million. The same money also helped to ensure the United States FDA gave emergency use approval for the Pfizer jab to be given to children aged 12 – 15 and unfortunately we’re now starting to see the grave consequences of this decision.
Consequences that are both tragic, and completely unnecessary. These new “vaccines” are still in trials until 2023 at the earliest, this means they are experimental. This is precisely why they have only been given emergency use approval. There is no emergency when it comes to children and the alleged Covid-19 disease, not a single child has died of Covid-19, and they do not suffer serious disease either.
UK authorities have clearly not learnt from the United States mistakes which have led to the deaths of numerous children?
A 16 year-old female received the Pfizer vaccine on the 19th March 2021. Nine days later the same female went into cardiac arrest at home. By the 30th March 2021 she had sadly died.
A 17 year-old female started to suffer difficulty breathing and chest pain eight days after having the Pfizer vaccine. She then suffered cardiac arrest and sadly died.
A 15 year-old female suffered cardiac arrest and ended up in intensive care four days after having the Moderna mRNA jab. She also sadly died.
A five-month old breast-fed baby developed a rash one day after his mother had received the Pfizer jab. Within 24 hours he was inconsolable, refusing to eat and developed a fever. Medical tests discovered the baby had elevated liver enzymes. The baby was hospitalised however his condition worsened and he was diagnosed with Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), a rare blood disorder.
In TTP, blood clots form in small blood vessels throughout the body. The clots can limit or block the flow of oxygen-rich blood to the body’s organs, such as the brain, kidneys, and heart.
Sadly the baby passed away just two days later.
A 16 year-old male received the Pfizer vaccine and developed a headache and an upset stomach two days after having the second dose. Sadly the following day the boy was found dead in bed.
A fifteen year-old female received her second dose of the Pfizer jab on the 6th June 2021. Sadly one day later she died suddenly without reason.