Is this the real reason why Telegram CEO Pavel Durov was arrested? A Massive Leak! | MOH
Anti-Israel hackers have released troves of classified data: Haaretz
Anti-Israel hackers have released troves of classified data: Haaretz
Censorship - is Censorship Sweeping the Nation?
Yes it is
Telegram CEO Pavel Durov was indicted in France today and ordered to post bail of 5 million euros. The multi-billionaire was forbidden from leaving the country and must report to police twice a week while the case continues.
Charges were detailed in a statement issued today by Paris prosecutor Laure Beccuau, which was provided to Ars. They are nearly identical to the possible charges released by Beccuau on Monday.
The first charge listed is complicity in "web-mastering an online platform in order to enable an illegal transaction in organized group." Today's press release said this charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a 500,000-euro fine.
Telegram's alleged refusal to cooperate with law enforcement on criminal investigations resulted in a charge of "refusal to communicate, at the request of competent authorities, information or documents necessary for carrying out and operating interceptions allowed by law."
Beccuau said there was a near-total lack of response from Telegram to requests for cooperation in cases related to crimes against minors, drug crimes, and online hate. This led authorities "to open an investigation into the possible criminal responsibility of the messaging app's executives in the commission of these offenses," Beccuau said, as quoted by Bloomberg.
Durov was further charged with complicity in drug trafficking and distribution of child pornography.
He was also charged with providing cryptology services without making required declarations to government officials. Under French law, providers of cryptology must make declarations to ANSSI, the country's cybersecurity agency. French authorities may request that companies provide "the technical characteristics and the source code of the means of cryptology which was the subject of the declaration."
The charges against Durov include "providing cryptology services aiming to ensure confidentiality without certified declaration," "providing a cryptology tool not solely ensuring authentication or integrity monitoring without prior declaration," and "importing a cryptology tool ensuring authentication or integrity monitoring without prior declaration."
Telegram offers a mix of private messaging and social network features. Telegram messages do not have end-to-end encryption by default, but the security feature can be enabled for one-on-one conversations.
In response to Durov's arrest, Telegram said on Sunday that it follows the law and industry standards on moderation and called it "absurd to claim that a platform or its owner are responsible for abuse of that platform."
French authorities also reportedly issued a warrant for the arrest of Durov's brother and fellow Telegram co-founder, Nikolai.
Duration 21:34
ZIONISM is an anti-Christ philosophy - Christ was murdered at the demand of the Jews as a form of CENSORSHIP
Efforts to Outlaw Criticism of Israel and Zionism (0:03)
Historical Comparisons and Religious Context (1:36)
Zionism and the Rejection of Christ's Teachings (3:41)
The Antichrist Nature of Zionism (9:22)
The Role of Christian Churches and the Teachings of Christ (15:32)
Promotion of Health Products and Final Thoughts (17:22)
U.S. State Department leading charge to abolish free speech globally
09/04/2024 // Ethan Huff
It started with Henry Kissinger in 1973 when the State Department was founded, followed by Madeleine Albright in 1997; Condoleeza Rice in 2005; Hillary Clinton in 2009; and Anthony Blinken under the current regime.
These are the most well-known names from the list but there were also others in between who, like those before and after them, made it their priority to serve foreign interests rather than the interests of We the People as far as free speech goes.
Since its founding, the State Department has been working behind the scenes with the CIA, the FBI, DHS, the NSA and other deep state entities to wage war on people's right to speak freely. These culprits claim they represent "democracy" and "freedom," but in practice they aim for something much different.
Former State Department employee Mike Benz spoke with Tucker Carlson recently about this global war on free speech taking place from right within the heart of Washington. You can watch the interview below:
Continued at link...
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) filed a federal lawsuit challenging an Arizona city’s rule that forbids people from criticizing government officials at city council meetings. During the public comment period of the Aug. 20 city council meeting, resident Rebekah Massie criticized the city attorney’s pay raise. Mayor Skip Hall interrupted her, saying that her comments broke a city rule prohibiting “charges or complaints against any employee of the City or members of the body.” Massie accurately responded that the policy violates the First Amendment. “I wanted to teach my children the importance of standing up for their rights and doing what is right — now I’m teaching that lesson to the city,” said Massie. “It’s important to fight back to show all of my children that the First Amendment is more powerful than the whims of any government official.” The First Amendment protects every American’s right to criticize public officials. The last thing people like Rebekah Massie should fear when they go to a city council meeting to speak is leaving in handcuffs. FIRE looks forward to vindicating Rebekah’s rights in court.
The internet is buzzing with the news that arrest warrants have been issued for both the Rumble CEO, Christopher Pavlovski, and GAB CEO, Andrew Torba.
‘This didn’t feel like British police questioning. More like Mossad or Shin Bet.’ Palestine activist Sarah Wilkinson on how balaclava’d ‘gorillas’ - no warrant or ID shown - ransacked her home, stole money and brutalised her.
Neil Oliver is joined by Canadian journalist David Krayden to discuss the erosion of freedom of speech in the UK and Canada, and the parrallels between the two countries.