Charlie Kirk was an American patriot, but more importantly he was a 21st century Christian martyr (he wonât be the last)
Itâs the day after and we are still trying to make sense of it all.
Why was a 31-year-old conservative activist gunned down in broad daylight while doing what he does best, speaking to college students about the evils of this world and giving advice on how to counter it?
Why was he murdered, by who, and what should be the lesson to the rest of us who are like-minded and share his values?
@ThePrisoner if you still believe it might be ai and changed fingers and donât see it come off in the video I posted I might be able to illustrate and explain it more effectively.
An opinion:
Now that the dust has settled (a little bit) on the death of Charlie Kirk, and more information is available to discern; I'd like to share my thoughts if I may. For a short time, it was thought that possibly he was not dead at all and the entire event was a "fake", but something changed my mind as soon as I heard it (heard him). This is in reference to Netanyahu coming out and saying that "Israel" was not responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk. Unlike other leaders that mix truth with lies, Netanyahu lies all the time, 100% reversal of truth; not a matter of mixing truth with lies; just lies. So, when I heard him say what he said, the opposite (the truth) would be that the Mossad/counterfeit-Israel/Zionists were responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk. Some of the alt-media are pointing in the direction that he was killed because he pubilcly began to reverse course and make a stand against Zionism. The hole in that theory is that there are other alt-media personalities who began to loudly speak-out against Zionism, against Ashkenazi-jews, and the Gaza genocide and remain alive and still very much popular with a large audience. Yet, Charlie Kirk was killed. Pubilcly executed even. IMO, he was murdered prior to the event witnessed by the public on social media; and that staged-event was for public consumption. Because my thoughts align with these people being satanists / illuminati / freemasons and there is a lot of data pointing to confirm that; his death appeared to be a sacrifice for evil; for what THEY refer to as "good" for a greater cause. Death is at the core of their cult. It includes those in their club sometimes too. When I hear some of the alt-media "expose" how CK began to voice a different narrative; and feared for his life because of it; and that appears to make sense and an "obvious" conclusion; what they are reporting is not entirely true and in fact is misleading as it is meant to be per controlled opposition.
Bottom-line: the NWO agenda goes forth full-speed ahead; the Epstein-files headlines are silenced (it now seems pale in comparison); division increases; genocide continues; more war. CK was killed/sacrified for their greater evil, IMO.
Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for Light, and Light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
I think there are far more important issues come to light on this event since than the AI ring 
I agree that this specific detail isn't the most important part of the bigger picture. What matters to me is not the detail itself, but the way it was reasoned about and handled in our exchange.
The way someone reasons about and handles small points often reflects how theyâll approach larger ones, and thatâs why I felt it was worth clarifying.
Iâm not asking you to linger on the detail any longer, but I do think itâs fair to acknowledge when something has been explained and understood correctly. That kind of recognition isnât about âwinningâ a pointâitâs about keeping the conversation clear, honest, and constructive.
So, was I able to show and explain what happened to the ring, please? 
It sure seems a very odd ring if it is C shaped, almost like its destined to be lostâŚâŚâŚnever seen one like that before, so I am still not convincedâŚ..but a bit more so, if that makes sense.
It's quite clearly seen in the fidgeting video where he is able to get it off his finger by just fidgeting. His might have a latch which we aren't able to see...
Yeah, clearly quite easy to come off.
I have not been able to find the exact same model but they clearly exist.
So, is a C shaped/hinged ring that comes off and even is seen dropping in the video now more likely to you than the ring switching fingers because of AI, please?
I still canât see how a ring like that can change fingers as the guy is in his death throes, but it would explain how it fell offâŚ.
It didn't change fingers. What we're seeing the ring in front of the other finger, not on it, as it is dropping to the ground.
In one of the frames, the shape is almost identical to the fidgeting video when it's off his finger and possible hold on with a possible hinge on the backside. Something I've demonstrated twice. If I add contours to the ring in Photoshop you might better understand what you're seeing if that is unclear.
Similar to the Israeli attack in 2024 across Lebanon and Syria that involved pager explosions, a similar scenario has been proposed by someone on X.
He begins by saying:
"Based solely on my analysis of the two angles of the events on September 10th I have come to the conclusion that this is the object [referring to the microphone CK was wearing] that struck Charlie Kirk in the neck." https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968489707563549064
The DJI Mic 2 is a wireless microphone with a rectangular magnetic clasp. This device has a 300mAh battery that weighs 8 grams:
To view his explanation which is posted in multiple tweets, an X account may be required to login. But, here are some of the tweets:
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968490753132245047
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968491783848915176
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968492644255887864
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968493621142855900
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968495634484240833
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968892603648160182
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968893466173141203
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968894205922513228
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968894499658100786
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968895054275072222
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1968896559036158277
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1969044753216880720
- https://x.com/jonaaronbray/status/1969063865972380064
The man (Jon Bray) who made the analysis: "Charlie Kirk was assassinated by a hidden shape charge. The battery of his RĂDE Wireless mic exploded via detonation."
is seeking to get this information out to the public. Thus far, it is the most plausible explanation. But, so far no response from the likes of James O'Keefe, Lara Logan, Candace Owens, Thomas Massie, Mike Adams, Rand Paul, MTG to name just a few.
Remember this:
It is surprising that the theory by Jon Bray is not being addressed in the alt-media. 
What narratives are being promoted in the mainstream alt-media (MAM)?
1st - That Mossad / the Zionists are responsible for the death of C.K.; some elaborate that it included the FBI.
2nd - It was an assassination by a gun shot, but not accomplished by the young man (Tyler Robinson) who has been accused of it.
3rd - C.K. was assassinated because he spoke out against Zionism.
4th - C.K. feared for his life because of his recent statements against Zionism and against the Gaza Genocide.
Brief analysis:
1st - Makes sense that it was Mossad/Zionists.
2nd - Appears to make sense, and the mainstream alt-media (MAM) is selling it; but, lots of holes (no pun intended) in the gun-shot theory and how exactly that transpired; many different arguments on that topic with no clear resolution. But, the mainstream alt-media, thus far, is holding to the claim that it was death by gun-shot.
No doubt, it was made to look like that. Jon Bray's microphone analysis counters that theory.
Agreed that Tyler Robinson was a patsy.
3rd - Another narrative that appears to make sense; but, also has holes in it, because other hi-profile mainstream alt-media personalities speak-out and they are very much alive, i.e. Stew Peters, Candace Owens.
4th - If he really feared for his life, would he continue to host live audiences on a stage without a bullet-proof enclosure around him?
Will the whole unadulterated truth be revealed? Some say he is not dead, but agree that it showed signs of being a ritual sacrifice (satanists / freemason related). I suspect the body of C.K. was killed if one agrees that it was a ritual sacrifice (and it looks like it was) because a ritual satanic sacrifice without a dead body does not add-up. But, the question remains, is why Bray's theory of a microphone detonating not getting more attention? Usually, things like that go "viral".