Most likely……
I am 95% sure he WAS assassinated.
Or Twitter have removed it, do you know for a fact he removed it, and why if he did, was he under pressure? Twitter has a track record of censorship.
Most likely?
Have I really not been able to clearly shown what happened to the ring?
Here is the video in high resolution. In it you can see the ring come off at the end. You might need to download it go frame by frame. I can assist if you are unable to rip it.
A book entitled “The Shooting of Charlie Kirk” by Anastasia J Casey has appeared on Amazon with a PUBLICATION DATE OF SEPTEMBER 9TH 2025. A DAY BEFORE HE WAS ASSASSINATED.
'The Shooting of Charlie Kirk': Mysterious book on Trump all ..
Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/123838352.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Cybe, your thoughts on this one please……Thanks @cybe Excuse the Language
Please what do you think about this video ? There was a strange black thing on his shirt and strangely went on his neck when his body got shot?
Great you brought it up too. It took me a quite long time to get the gif file to4 mb before i could post this 
I believe that it would be beneficial for all of us to clear up this ring thing first even though it might seem odd to get stuck on a little detail.
Now @theprisoner do you see the ring fall off? Do you still think it is AI?
It looks like it falls off but how did it switch from one finger to the other without falling off before?
1 Like
Watch video again, its inside the shirt, the view is from the other side. This is totally different than what is shown, different shirt, different side etc. The video I posted is from a different POV than the other, its like the blood just pours out of the top of the T shirt.
Thank-you for your reply, I still feel something is not right. Why would he use two microphones please? Why would the microphone switch from the chest to the neck all of a sudden please? When he was shut in the neck.
2 Likes
One more try before I give up
It's not switching fingers, it's falling off his finger because the hinge is open on the back.
Again; Do you see a similarity in the shape of the C shaped ring (with a flat front and a hinge at the back) here?
One can use one microphone, two, even three or nine. They might have different functions. The big one he uses is to talk to the crowd, the small one might be recording. The event is probably being filmed and that small microphone is recording the sound for that.
Ok buddy.
1 Like
Understood, thank-you.
1 Like
Ditto.
The very first time I saw the video (shot in the neck), and I repeatedly viewed it numerous times, I “saw” it as fake because I saw no blood. Then I asked someone else to view it and they said look at all that blood. Once the blood spurting was pointed out to me, I thought how in the world did I not see that. It was not an issue of visual clarity or poor vision. At that point it was viewed as an assassination and certain death. As far as the neck shooting video, there is only one video that has been released and shown repeatedly over and over again. Just when I thought it was a Mossad hit based on Kirk’s recent outspoken views against Zionism, and the case was closed …. in that he was murdered by a skilled assassin; now there is further evidence to question the reality of what really happened. This is not good at all when manipulation of reality occurs at this level. The technology to do so is certainly there.
Call from A Call For An Uprising presented some more data:
DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE WORLD STAGE! THEY KILLED CHARACTER CHARLIE KIRK BUT THE ACTOR IS STILL ALIVE
1 Like
Very well could be.
A new or different level of reasoning and discernment is required in these End-Times. Has there ever been deception at this level to this degree in the history of man? Very concerning!
1 Like
There are videos from many angles.
Oh yeah, I forgot all about looking into why the pressure wave before he is hit. I was going to look into that but have spent a bit too much time on that ring...
Here's a quick Grok analys which I haven't gone through yet:-
This link has hyperlinks to posts that it bases it's output on:-
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_3b716fae-5375-4a16-9568-8487eb33c52c
and here is the same as above but without the links:-
The shooting of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University has sparked numerous analyses of the available video footage, particularly regarding the apparent movement of his shirt and face moments before the visible bullet impact (which resulted in a fatal neck wound from a single shot fired from approximately 200 yards away). Based on discussions and frame-by-frame breakdowns from social media and news sources, here are the primary explanations circulating:
1. Shockwave and Air Displacement from a High-Velocity Bullet
A supersonic rifle bullet (traveling faster than the speed of sound, typically 2,000–3,000 feet per second) creates a shockwave and displaces air in front of and around it as it approaches the target. This can cause clothing, hair, or skin to flutter or distort slightly before the bullet makes contact, especially in slow-motion video. The effect might resemble a "blast of air" because the compressed air wave arrives microseconds ahead of or simultaneously with the projectile, but video frame rates can make it appear sequential. This is a basic principle of ballistics—similar to how a whip crack creates a sonic boom—and doesn't require any special equipment on Kirk's part.
2. Impact on a Bulletproof Vest Causing Deformation and Ricochet
Multiple eyewitness and video analyses suggest Kirk was wearing concealed body armor (e.g., a soft Level IIIA vest or plate carrier under his t-shirt, common for high-profile conservatives at public events). The bullet reportedly struck the upper chest area first, deforming the vest and causing the shirt to "jump" or puff outward due to the sudden transfer of kinetic energy and trapped air being expelled. This movement happens instantly upon impact but before any penetration or blood is visible. The round then allegedly fragmented or ricocheted upward into his neck, explaining the delayed appearance of the fatal wound (blood spray downward from the throat). The shirt's reaction looks like an air blast because flexible fabric amplifies the vest's compression/expansion. News reports confirm a single shot but don't rule out armor, and forensic experts note this is consistent with how soft vests handle rifle rounds (they stop penetration but transfer blunt force).
3. Conspiracy Theories Involving Staging
Some users claim the incident was faked or an inside job, with the shirt movement caused by a hidden device like an airbag, squib (explosive blood pack), or remote-detonated prop under his clothing to simulate impact. In this view, the "air blast" is artificial, timed with a gunshot sound effect, and the black object seen in some frames is a projectile launched from the device into his neck for realism. These theories often point to hand signals in the crowd or security lapses as evidence of orchestration, but they're unsubstantiated and contradict official reports of a real fatality and ongoing manhunt for the shooter.
The vest/ricochet explanation aligns best with the physics of the footage and Kirk's profile (he often discussed personal security), while the shockwave theory fits if no armor was involved. Official autopsies or ballistics reports aren't public yet, so these remain speculative. If you have a specific video link, I can analyze it further for more details.